Federal Tort Claims Act: Current Legislative and Judicial Issues
Henry Cohen, Vanessa K. Burrows
Abstract
Open-access reader
Henry Cohen, Vanessa K. Burrows
Abstract
Open-access reader
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the statute by which the United States authorizes tort suits to be brought against itself.With exceptions, it makes the United States liable for injuries caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any federal employee acting within the scope of his employment, in accordance with the law of the state where the act or omission occurred.Three major exceptions, under which the United States may not be held liable, even in circumstances where a private person could be held liable under state law, are the Feres doctrine, which prohibits suits by military personnel for injuries sustained incident to service; the discretionary function exception, which immunizes the United States for acts or omissions of its employees that involve policy decisions; and the intentional tort exception, which precludes suits against the United States for assault and battery, among some other intentional torts, unless they are committed by federal law enforcement or investigative officials.This report discusses, among other things, the application of the Feres doctrine to suits for injuries caused by medical malpractice in the military, the prohibition of suits by victims of atomic testing, Supreme Court cases interpreting the discretionary 1 Federal Housing Administration v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242, 244 (1940).2 United States v.Chemical Foundation, Inc., 272 U.S. 1, 20 (1926).3 The United States may be held liable under the FTCA for torts of employees of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, but not for torts of government contractors.28 U.S.C. § 2671.4 Another section of the FTCA provides that the United States shall be liable "in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances" (28 U.S.C. § 2674(a)), and the Supreme Court has noted that "like circumstances" are not limited to "the same circumstances," but include "analogous" circumstances.United States v. Olson, 126 S. Ct. 510, 513 (2005).
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the statute by which the United States authorizes tort suits to be brought against itself.With exceptions, it makes the United States liable for injuries caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any federal employee acting within the scope of his employment, in accordance with the law of the state where the act or omission occurred.Three major exceptions, under which the United States may not be held liable, even in circumstances where a private person could be held liable under state law, are the Feres doctrine, which prohibits suits by military personnel for injuries sustained incident to service; the discretionary function exception, which immunizes the United States for acts or omissions of its employees that involve policy decisions; and the intentional tort exception, which precludes suits against the United States for assault and battery, among some other intentional torts, unless they are committed by federal law enforcement or investigative officials.This report discusses, among other things, the application of the Feres doctrine to suits for injuries caused by medical malpractice in the military, the prohibition of suits by victims of atomic testing, Supreme Court cases interpreting the discretionary 1 Federal Housing Administration v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242, 244 (1940).2 United States v.Chemical Foundation, Inc., 272 U.S. 1, 20 (1926).3 The United States may be held liable under the FTCA for torts of employees of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, but not for torts of government contractors.28 U.S.C. § 2671.4 Another section of the FTCA provides that the United States shall be liable "in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances" (28 U.S.C. § 2674(a)), and the Supreme Court has noted that "like circumstances" are not limited to "the same circumstances," but include "analogous" circumstances.United States v. Olson, 126 S. Ct. 510, 513 (2005).
Key concepts: Legislature, Tort, Political science, Current (fluid), Law, Legislation, Law and economics, Economics