2019•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Dismantling a State Monopoly: Insight from Theory

Octave Keutiben, Didier Tatoutchoup

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We analyze competition with taxation as an alternative to state monopoly by highlighting the importance of the industry's cost structure and the external cost of consuming the good. Under government revenue maximization assumption, competition is a better alternative to state monopoly if and only if the state monopoly has diseconomies of scale or is producing in the range of output where there are diseconomies of scale. The result is unchanged even when the government also accounts for the social cost of consuming the good. However, in this case, total output will be higher than the monopoly output only if the social cost of consuming the good is too small, that is it is lower than a determined threshold value. Interestingly, the analysis also showed that under both assumptions, oligopoly is a better alternative to state monopoly than perfect competition.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We analyze competition with taxation as an alternative to state monopoly by highlighting the importance of the industry's cost structure and the external cost of consuming the good. Under government revenue maximization assumption, competition is a better alternative to state monopoly if and only if the state monopoly has diseconomies of scale or is producing in the range of output where there are diseconomies of scale. The result is unchanged even when the government also accounts for the social cost of consuming the good. However, in this case, total output will be higher than the monopoly output only if the social cost of consuming the good is too small, that is it is lower than a determined threshold value. Interestingly, the analysis also showed that under both assumptions, oligopoly is a better alternative to state monopoly than perfect competition.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We analyze competition with taxation as an alternative to state monopoly by highlighting the importance of the industry's cost structure and the external cost of consuming the good. Under government revenue maximization assumption, competition is a better alternative to state monopoly if and only if the state monopoly has diseconomies of scale or is producing in the range of output where there are diseconomies of scale. The result is unchanged even when the government also accounts for the social cost of consuming the good. However, in this case, total output will be higher than the monopoly output only if the social cost of consuming the good is too small, that is it is lower than a determined threshold value. Interestingly, the analysis also showed that under both assumptions, oligopoly is a better alternative to state monopoly than perfect competition.

Key concepts: Monopoly, Diseconomies of scale, Economics, Competition (biology), Microeconomics, Revenue, Oligopoly, Social cost

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dismantling a State Monopoly: Insight from Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens