2020Unpublished venueRequires access

An Argument for Skepticism

Peter Unger

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

The argument to be offered has as its conclusion the universal form of the skeptical thesis, that is, the proposition that nobody ever knows anything to be so. The opposite of skepticism is often called dogmatism. In these terms, dogmatism is the view that certain things are known to be so. The stronger the form of dogmatism, the more sorts of things would be claimed to be known and, so, the weaker the form of skepticism which might still be allowed to hold. The very particular idea that knowing entails its being all right to be certain is suggested, further, by the fact that knowing entails, at least, that one is certain. The attitude of certainty concerns any sequence of experience or events which could consistently be presented to a sentient subject, without its description prejudging the issue on which it might supposedly bear.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The argument to be offered has as its conclusion the universal form of the skeptical thesis, that is, the proposition that nobody ever knows anything to be so. The opposite of skepticism is often called dogmatism. In these terms, dogmatism is the view that certain things are known to be so. The stronger the form of dogmatism, the more sorts of things would be claimed to be known and, so, the weaker the form of skepticism which might still be allowed to hold. The very particular idea that knowing entails its being all right to be certain is suggested, further, by the fact that knowing entails, at least, that one is certain. The attitude of certainty concerns any sequence of experience or events which could consistently be presented to a sentient subject, without its description prejudging the issue on which it might supposedly bear.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The argument to be offered has as its conclusion the universal form of the skeptical thesis, that is, the proposition that nobody ever knows anything to be so. The opposite of skepticism is often called dogmatism. In these terms, dogmatism is the view that certain things are known to be so. The stronger the form of dogmatism, the more sorts of things would be claimed to be known and, so, the weaker the form of skepticism which might still be allowed to hold. The very particular idea that knowing entails its being all right to be certain is suggested, further, by the fact that knowing entails, at least, that one is certain. The attitude of certainty concerns any sequence of experience or events which could consistently be presented to a sentient subject, without its description prejudging the issue on which it might supposedly bear.

Key concepts: Skepticism, Argument (complex analysis), Epistemology, Philosophy, Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Argument for Skepticism — Research Paper | ScholarLens