2020Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseRequires access

Sedentary Behavior And Associations To Portable Screen-Based Device Use And Parental Influence In Rural Children

Jonathan B. Naylor, Beth J. Patton

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Previous studies from our research group have examined the potential link between portable screen-based devices (i.e., smartphones and tablet computers) and sedentary behavior/physical activity in a primarily suburban population of young children and their parents. It was determined child sedentary behavior was related to portable screen-based device use while physical activity was not. While such relationships were found in a suburban population, rural demographic groups have been shown to differ in both their screen-based device use and physical activity variables suggesting the corresponding associations may also differ. PURPOSE: To examine screen-based media device (smartphone, tablet, television, video games, computer) use in children and parents from a rural population in relation to sedentary behavior and physical activity. METHODS: Parents (N = 7, 33.57 ± 3.95 years old) completed validated questionnaires assessing average daily total screen use (smartphone, tablet, television, video games, computer), portable screen-based device use (smartphone, tablet), sedentary behavior, and physical activity for both themselves and their children (N = 7, 7.00 ± 1.15 years old). Four standard regression models were used to assess the relationship between criterion variables and the following predictor variables: child age, child sex, child average daily sedentary time, and child physical activity. Criterion variables included (a) child portable screen-based device use (Model 1), (b) child total screen use (Model 2), (c) parent portable screen-based device use (Model 3), and (d) parent total screen use (Model 4). RESULTS: Child sedentary time was significantly (β = 0.92, t = 4.65, p = 0.04) and positively associated with parent screen-based device use. Child age, sex, and physical activity were not significantly (p > 0.05) related to either parent or child portable or total device use. CONCLUSION: Contrary to findings in young children from suburban populations, the current results from this limited sample suggest child sedentary behavior was not found to be related to portable screen-based device use in rural children. Furthermore, the data confirms previous findings that parental screen-based device use was predictive of sitting in their children.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Previous studies from our research group have examined the potential link between portable screen-based devices (i.e., smartphones and tablet computers) and sedentary behavior/physical activity in a primarily suburban population of young children and their parents. It was determined child sedentary behavior was related to portable screen-based device use while physical activity was not. While such relationships were found in a suburban population, rural demographic groups have been shown to differ in both their screen-based device use and physical activity variables suggesting the corresponding associations may also differ. PURPOSE: To examine screen-based media device (smartphone, tablet, television, video games, computer) use in children and parents from a rural population in relation to sedentary behavior and physical activity. METHODS: Parents (N = 7, 33.57 ± 3.95 years old) completed validated questionnaires assessing average daily total screen use (smartphone, tablet, television, video games, computer), portable screen-based device use (smartphone, tablet), sedentary behavior, and physical activity for both themselves and their children (N = 7, 7.00 ± 1.15 years old). Four standard regression models were used to assess the relationship between criterion variables and the following predictor variables: child age, child sex, child average daily sedentary time, and child physical activity. Criterion variables included (a) child portable screen-based device use (Model 1), (b) child total screen use (Model 2), (c) parent portable screen-based device use (Model 3), and (d) parent total screen use (Model 4). RESULTS: Child sedentary time was significantly (β = 0.92, t = 4.65, p = 0.04) and positively associated with parent screen-based device use. Child age, sex, and physical activity were not significantly (p > 0.05) related to either parent or child portable or total device use. CONCLUSION: Contrary to findings in young children from suburban populations, the current results from this limited sample suggest child sedentary behavior was not found to be related to portable screen-based device use in rural children. Furthermore, the data confirms previous findings that parental screen-based device use was predictive of sitting in their children.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Previous studies from our research group have examined the potential link between portable screen-based devices (i.e., smartphones and tablet computers) and sedentary behavior/physical activity in a primarily suburban population of young children and their parents. It was determined child sedentary behavior was related to portable screen-based device use while physical activity was not. While such relationships were found in a suburban population, rural demographic groups have been shown to differ in both their screen-based device use and physical activity variables suggesting the corresponding associations may also differ. PURPOSE: To examine screen-based media device (smartphone, tablet, television, video games, computer) use in children and parents from a rural population in relation to sedentary behavior and physical activity. METHODS: Parents (N = 7, 33.57 ± 3.95 years old) completed validated questionnaires assessing average daily total screen use (smartphone, tablet, television, video games, computer), portable screen-based device use (smartphone, tablet), sedentary behavior, and physical activity for both themselves and their children (N = 7, 7.00 ± 1.15 years old). Four standard regression models were used to assess the relationship between criterion variables and the following predictor variables: child age, child sex, child average daily sedentary time, and child physical activity. Criterion variables included (a) child portable screen-based device use (Model 1), (b) child total screen use (Model 2), (c) parent portable screen-based device use (Model 3), and (d) parent total screen use (Model 4). RESULTS: Child sedentary time was significantly (β = 0.92, t = 4.65, p = 0.04) and positively associated with parent screen-based device use. Child age, sex, and physical activity were not significantly (p > 0.05) related to either parent or child portable or total device use. CONCLUSION: Contrary to findings in young children from suburban populations, the current results from this limited sample suggest child sedentary behavior was not found to be related to portable screen-based device use in rural children. Furthermore, the data confirms previous findings that parental screen-based device use was predictive of sitting in their children.

Key concepts: Screen time, Sedentary behavior, Physical activity, Population, Sedentary lifestyle, Activity monitor, Psychology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sedentary Behavior And Associations To Portable Screen-Based Device Use And Parental Influence In Rural Children — Research Paper | ScholarLens