2008SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Creditors and the New Corporate Governance

Frederick Tung

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper challenges the conventional view of corporate governance that focuses exclusively on corporate law as the dominant mechanism by which investors exercise control over corporate affairs. Creditors - especially banks and other private lenders - play an enormously important role in influencing management. Only a handful of legal scholars have noted the governance role that private lenders play. Even these few scholars focus predominantly on the distress context, observing creditor influence only after a borrower firm has lapsed into financial distress. In my view, these scholars underestimate private lenders' sway over corporate managers. The distress focus casts the influence of private debt as episodic, exceptional, and dramatic. Creditor influence matters only when a firm is in peril. I argue just the opposite - that creditor influence is pervasive. I highlight the governance role of creditors, relying on empirical studies showing the effects of private debt on corporations' financing and investment decisions, operational matters, and even officer retention. I detail the institutional and contractual features of private debt that constrain managerial discretion. I also identify important theoretical and policy implications for corporate and debtor-creditor law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper challenges the conventional view of corporate governance that focuses exclusively on corporate law as the dominant mechanism by which investors exercise control over corporate affairs. Creditors - especially banks and other private lenders - play an enormously important role in influencing management. Only a handful of legal scholars have noted the governance role that private lenders play. Even these few scholars focus predominantly on the distress context, observing creditor influence only after a borrower firm has lapsed into financial distress. In my view, these scholars underestimate private lenders' sway over corporate managers. The distress focus casts the influence of private debt as episodic, exceptional, and dramatic. Creditor influence matters only when a firm is in peril. I argue just the opposite - that creditor influence is pervasive. I highlight the governance role of creditors, relying on empirical studies showing the effects of private debt on corporations' financing and investment decisions, operational matters, and even officer retention. I detail the institutional and contractual features of private debt that constrain managerial discretion. I also identify important theoretical and policy implications for corporate and debtor-creditor law.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper challenges the conventional view of corporate governance that focuses exclusively on corporate law as the dominant mechanism by which investors exercise control over corporate affairs. Creditors - especially banks and other private lenders - play an enormously important role in influencing management. Only a handful of legal scholars have noted the governance role that private lenders play. Even these few scholars focus predominantly on the distress context, observing creditor influence only after a borrower firm has lapsed into financial distress. In my view, these scholars underestimate private lenders' sway over corporate managers. The distress focus casts the influence of private debt as episodic, exceptional, and dramatic. Creditor influence matters only when a firm is in peril. I argue just the opposite - that creditor influence is pervasive. I highlight the governance role of creditors, relying on empirical studies showing the effects of private debt on corporations' financing and investment decisions, operational matters, and even officer retention. I detail the institutional and contractual features of private debt that constrain managerial discretion. I also identify important theoretical and policy implications for corporate and debtor-creditor law.

Key concepts: Creditor, Corporate governance, Business, Receivership, Debt, Context (archaeology), Debtor, Accounting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Creditors and the New Corporate Governance — Research Paper | ScholarLens