2020Journal of Medical PrimatologyRequires access

Evaluation of anaesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects after intramuscular administration of alfaxalone alone, alfaxalone‐ketamine and alfaxalone‐butorphanol‐medetomidine in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)

Takako Miyabe‐Nishiwaki, Miki Miwa, Naho Konoike, Akihisa Kaneko, Akiyo Ishigami, Takayoshi Natsume, Andrew J. J. MacIntosh, Katsuki Nakamura

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Anaesthesia is often required in common marmosets undergoing various procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate anaesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of alfaxalone, alfaxalone‐ketamine and alfaxalone‐butorphanol‐medetomidine in common marmosets. Methods The following treatments were repeatedly administered to seven female common marmosets: Treatment A, alfaxalone (12 mg kg‐1) alone; treatment AK, alfaxalone (1 mg animal−1) plus ketamine (2.5 mg animal−1); treatment AMB, alfaxalone (4 mg kg−1), medetomidine (50 µg kg−1) plus butorphanol (0.3 mg kg−1); and treatment AMB‐Ati, AMB with atipamezole at 45 minutes. Results and Conclusions Marmosets became laterally recumbent and unresponsive for approximately 30 minutes in A and AK and for approximately 60 minutes in AMB. The animals showed rapid recovery following atipamezole injection in AMB‐Ati. The decrease in heart rate and SpO2 was significantly greater in AMB compared to A and AK. Oxygen supplementation, anaesthetic monitors and atipamezole should be available especially when AMB is administered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Background Anaesthesia is often required in common marmosets undergoing various procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate anaesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of alfaxalone, alfaxalone‐ketamine and alfaxalone‐butorphanol‐medetomidine in common marmosets. Methods The following treatments were repeatedly administered to seven female common marmosets: Treatment A, alfaxalone (12 mg kg‐1) alone; treatment AK, alfaxalone (1 mg animal−1) plus ketamine (2.5 mg animal−1); treatment AMB, alfaxalone (4 mg kg−1), medetomidine (50 µg kg−1) plus butorphanol (0.3 mg kg−1); and treatment AMB‐Ati, AMB with atipamezole at 45 minutes. Results and Conclusions Marmosets became laterally recumbent and unresponsive for approximately 30 minutes in A and AK and for approximately 60 minutes in AMB. The animals showed rapid recovery following atipamezole injection in AMB‐Ati. The decrease in heart rate and SpO2 was significantly greater in AMB compared to A and AK. Oxygen supplementation, anaesthetic monitors and atipamezole should be available especially when AMB is administered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Background Anaesthesia is often required in common marmosets undergoing various procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate anaesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of alfaxalone, alfaxalone‐ketamine and alfaxalone‐butorphanol‐medetomidine in common marmosets. Methods The following treatments were repeatedly administered to seven female common marmosets: Treatment A, alfaxalone (12 mg kg‐1) alone; treatment AK, alfaxalone (1 mg animal−1) plus ketamine (2.5 mg animal−1); treatment AMB, alfaxalone (4 mg kg−1), medetomidine (50 µg kg−1) plus butorphanol (0.3 mg kg−1); and treatment AMB‐Ati, AMB with atipamezole at 45 minutes. Results and Conclusions Marmosets became laterally recumbent and unresponsive for approximately 30 minutes in A and AK and for approximately 60 minutes in AMB. The animals showed rapid recovery following atipamezole injection in AMB‐Ati. The decrease in heart rate and SpO2 was significantly greater in AMB compared to A and AK. Oxygen supplementation, anaesthetic monitors and atipamezole should be available especially when AMB is administered.

Key concepts: Butorphanol, Medetomidine, Atipamezole, Anesthesia, Ketamine, Medicine, Heart rate, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of anaesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects after intramuscular administration of alfaxalone alone, alfaxalone‐ketamine and alfaxalone‐butorphanol‐medetomidine in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) — Research Paper | ScholarLens