2020The Journal of Sexual MedicineRequires access

Are We Overstating the Risk of Priapism with Oral Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors?

Michael E. Rezaee, Martin Gross

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Priapism is an adverse drug reaction (ADR) associated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. AIM: The purpose of this study was to identify the true data about PDE5i-associated priapism to properly counsel patients. METHODS: We queried the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Reporting System Public Dashboard to identify cases of drug-induced priapism among medications commonly associated with priapism. Next, a systematic review and analysis of publications describing cases of drug-induced priapism were carried out. OUTCOMES: The main outome of this study is incidence of PDE5i-induced priapism. RESULTS: We found 411 cases of drug-induced priapism secondary to Viagra, Cialis, or Levitra reported to the Food and Drug Administration since 1998. Compared with PDE5is, drug-induced priapism was 2.6 (n = 1,065) and 2.0 times (n = 817) more commonly reported for second-generation antipsychotics and the antidepressant/sleep aid trazodone, respectively. A total of 240 manuscripts describing cases of drug-induced priapism in patients with non-sickle cell disease were identified. PDE5i-induced priapism accounted for only 2.9% (n = 7) of drug-induced priapism cases. Second-generation antipsychotics (33.8%), a group of "other" medications (11.3%), and alpha-adrenergic antagonists (8.8%) accounted for the greatest percentage of published drug-induced priapism cases. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Extensive counseling about priapism as an ADR for PDE5i for the routine treatment of erectile dysfunction is likely unnecessary. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The study used national-level data to identify drug-induced priapism cases. Reported and published cases of drug-induced priapism may reflect more severe and atypical cases of this ADR, which may have underestimated our results. CONCLUSION: PDE5i-induced priapism is a rare event. Drug-induced priapism should be attributed to a wider spectrum of medications that can cause this condition. Rezaee ME, Gross MS. Are We Overstating the Risk of Priapism With Oral Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors? J Sex Med 2020;17:1579-1582.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Priapism is an adverse drug reaction (ADR) associated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. AIM: The purpose of this study was to identify the true data about PDE5i-associated priapism to properly counsel patients. METHODS: We queried the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Reporting System Public Dashboard to identify cases of drug-induced priapism among medications commonly associated with priapism. Next, a systematic review and analysis of publications describing cases of drug-induced priapism were carried out. OUTCOMES: The main outome of this study is incidence of PDE5i-induced priapism. RESULTS: We found 411 cases of drug-induced priapism secondary to Viagra, Cialis, or Levitra reported to the Food and Drug Administration since 1998. Compared with PDE5is, drug-induced priapism was 2.6 (n = 1,065) and 2.0 times (n = 817) more commonly reported for second-generation antipsychotics and the antidepressant/sleep aid trazodone, respectively. A total of 240 manuscripts describing cases of drug-induced priapism in patients with non-sickle cell disease were identified. PDE5i-induced priapism accounted for only 2.9% (n = 7) of drug-induced priapism cases. Second-generation antipsychotics (33.8%), a group of "other" medications (11.3%), and alpha-adrenergic antagonists (8.8%) accounted for the greatest percentage of published drug-induced priapism cases. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Extensive counseling about priapism as an ADR for PDE5i for the routine treatment of erectile dysfunction is likely unnecessary. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The study used national-level data to identify drug-induced priapism cases. Reported and published cases of drug-induced priapism may reflect more severe and atypical cases of this ADR, which may have underestimated our results. CONCLUSION: PDE5i-induced priapism is a rare event. Drug-induced priapism should be attributed to a wider spectrum of medications that can cause this condition. Rezaee ME, Gross MS. Are We Overstating the Risk of Priapism With Oral Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors? J Sex Med 2020;17:1579-1582.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Priapism is an adverse drug reaction (ADR) associated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. AIM: The purpose of this study was to identify the true data about PDE5i-associated priapism to properly counsel patients. METHODS: We queried the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Reporting System Public Dashboard to identify cases of drug-induced priapism among medications commonly associated with priapism. Next, a systematic review and analysis of publications describing cases of drug-induced priapism were carried out. OUTCOMES: The main outome of this study is incidence of PDE5i-induced priapism. RESULTS: We found 411 cases of drug-induced priapism secondary to Viagra, Cialis, or Levitra reported to the Food and Drug Administration since 1998. Compared with PDE5is, drug-induced priapism was 2.6 (n = 1,065) and 2.0 times (n = 817) more commonly reported for second-generation antipsychotics and the antidepressant/sleep aid trazodone, respectively. A total of 240 manuscripts describing cases of drug-induced priapism in patients with non-sickle cell disease were identified. PDE5i-induced priapism accounted for only 2.9% (n = 7) of drug-induced priapism cases. Second-generation antipsychotics (33.8%), a group of "other" medications (11.3%), and alpha-adrenergic antagonists (8.8%) accounted for the greatest percentage of published drug-induced priapism cases. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Extensive counseling about priapism as an ADR for PDE5i for the routine treatment of erectile dysfunction is likely unnecessary. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The study used national-level data to identify drug-induced priapism cases. Reported and published cases of drug-induced priapism may reflect more severe and atypical cases of this ADR, which may have underestimated our results. CONCLUSION: PDE5i-induced priapism is a rare event. Drug-induced priapism should be attributed to a wider spectrum of medications that can cause this condition. Rezaee ME, Gross MS. Are We Overstating the Risk of Priapism With Oral Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors? J Sex Med 2020;17:1579-1582.

Key concepts: Priapism, Trazodone, Medicine, Erectile dysfunction, Drug, Adverse effect, Adverse drug reaction, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Are We Overstating the Risk of Priapism with Oral Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors? — Research Paper | ScholarLens