1997•Microscopy and MicroanalysisRequires access

Sub-100nm Axial Resolution in 3D Widefield Optical Microscopy Using Two Opposing Objective Lenses

Mats G. Gustafsson, David A. Agard, John W. Sedat

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract It has been understood since the days of Ernst Abbe that an optical microscope can reach higher resolution the wider the set of angles from which it can observe the specimen — this angular range, of course, is what is indicated by the Numerical Aperture (NA) of the objective lens. Over more than a century of objective lens development, this light collecting angle has been increased closer and closer to the full 180° angle available above a microscope slide. There is, however, a second, equally large and easily accessible set of observation angles available on the other side of the specimen slide, and a standard microscope makes no use whatsoever of light emitted in these directions. One might then ask whether there is not a substantial resolution advantage to be had by devising a microscope that does make use of this "back side" light. The answer, in fact, is yes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract It has been understood since the days of Ernst Abbe that an optical microscope can reach higher resolution the wider the set of angles from which it can observe the specimen — this angular range, of course, is what is indicated by the Numerical Aperture (NA) of the objective lens. Over more than a century of objective lens development, this light collecting angle has been increased closer and closer to the full 180° angle available above a microscope slide. There is, however, a second, equally large and easily accessible set of observation angles available on the other side of the specimen slide, and a standard microscope makes no use whatsoever of light emitted in these directions. One might then ask whether there is not a substantial resolution advantage to be had by devising a microscope that does make use of this "back side" light. The answer, in fact, is yes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract It has been understood since the days of Ernst Abbe that an optical microscope can reach higher resolution the wider the set of angles from which it can observe the specimen — this angular range, of course, is what is indicated by the Numerical Aperture (NA) of the objective lens. Over more than a century of objective lens development, this light collecting angle has been increased closer and closer to the full 180° angle available above a microscope slide. There is, however, a second, equally large and easily accessible set of observation angles available on the other side of the specimen slide, and a standard microscope makes no use whatsoever of light emitted in these directions. One might then ask whether there is not a substantial resolution advantage to be had by devising a microscope that does make use of this "back side" light. The answer, in fact, is yes.

Key concepts: Optics, Microscope, Lens (geology), Numerical aperture, Resolution (logic), Microscopy, Optical microscope, Aperture (computer memory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sub-100nm Axial Resolution in 3D Widefield Optical Microscopy Using Two Opposing Objective Lenses — Research Paper | ScholarLens