2020Technology Analysis and Strategic ManagementRequires access

Asymmetry of the technological cycle of disruptive innovations

Mario Coccia

Open publisher page 98 citations

Abstract

A vast literature exists on disruptive technologies. However, some fundamental questions are unknown, such as: how to measure the growth of disruptive technologies in competitive markets? How is the pathway of technological cycle of disruptive innovations? The study confronts these questions here by developing a theoretical and empirical analysis, which endeavours to explain the behaviour of disruptive technologies that generate industrial and corporate change. A simple model is proposed to measure the relative growth of disruptive technologies compared to established technologies. This analytical approach is applied on the evolution of technologies in the US sound-recorded music industry. Empirical findings suggest general properties that can expand disruptive innovation theory, namely: (1) disruptive technology has a disproportionate growth in markets compared to established technologies; (2) technological cycle of disruptive technology has up wave phase longer than down wave phase (asymmetric shape of technological cycle) and (3) disruptive technology has a series of major and minor technological advances of its own that pave the way for dominance on other established technologies in markets. Best practices for management of technology are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A vast literature exists on disruptive technologies. However, some fundamental questions are unknown, such as: how to measure the growth of disruptive technologies in competitive markets? How is the pathway of technological cycle of disruptive innovations? The study confronts these questions here by developing a theoretical and empirical analysis, which endeavours to explain the behaviour of disruptive technologies that generate industrial and corporate change. A simple model is proposed to measure the relative growth of disruptive technologies compared to established technologies. This analytical approach is applied on the evolution of technologies in the US sound-recorded music industry. Empirical findings suggest general properties that can expand disruptive innovation theory, namely: (1) disruptive technology has a disproportionate growth in markets compared to established technologies; (2) technological cycle of disruptive technology has up wave phase longer than down wave phase (asymmetric shape of technological cycle) and (3) disruptive technology has a series of major and minor technological advances of its own that pave the way for dominance on other established technologies in markets. Best practices for management of technology are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 98 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A vast literature exists on disruptive technologies. However, some fundamental questions are unknown, such as: how to measure the growth of disruptive technologies in competitive markets? How is the pathway of technological cycle of disruptive innovations? The study confronts these questions here by developing a theoretical and empirical analysis, which endeavours to explain the behaviour of disruptive technologies that generate industrial and corporate change. A simple model is proposed to measure the relative growth of disruptive technologies compared to established technologies. This analytical approach is applied on the evolution of technologies in the US sound-recorded music industry. Empirical findings suggest general properties that can expand disruptive innovation theory, namely: (1) disruptive technology has a disproportionate growth in markets compared to established technologies; (2) technological cycle of disruptive technology has up wave phase longer than down wave phase (asymmetric shape of technological cycle) and (3) disruptive technology has a series of major and minor technological advances of its own that pave the way for dominance on other established technologies in markets. Best practices for management of technology are discussed.

Key concepts: Disruptive innovation, Disruptive technology, Dominance (genetics), Emerging technologies, Industrial organization, Empirical evidence, Technological change, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Asymmetry of the technological cycle of disruptive innovations — Research Paper | ScholarLens