1991Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Space and the Airland Battle

John S Prall

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study investigates how well the potential of space technology is incorporated by the Army into its warfighting doctrine. The study examines the potential benefits of space systems for the military, focusing on Communications, Navigation, Reconnaissance and Surveillance, and Weather support. It evaluates which aspects of the warfighting doctrines, both AirLand Battle and its successor AirLand Battle Future, can be enhanced by the use of space systems. It describes the current Army space infrastructure and makes a determination as to its effectiveness in integrating space into the Army's day to day operations. The Army already uses space technology to some extent in its operations. Examples cited from America's recent conflicts, particularly those from Operation DESERT STORM, indicate that the Army recognizes the utility of space assets and is endeavoring to find ways to effectively use them. The study concludes that the Army should be tactical and operational user of space services, not a strategic operation of space systems, but that it does not yet fully accept that situation. Consequently, Army space operations remain somewhat unfocused, with emphasis shifting between support of national strategic requirements and the needs of the Army's operational and tactical level AirLand Battle commanders.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study investigates how well the potential of space technology is incorporated by the Army into its warfighting doctrine. The study examines the potential benefits of space systems for the military, focusing on Communications, Navigation, Reconnaissance and Surveillance, and Weather support. It evaluates which aspects of the warfighting doctrines, both AirLand Battle and its successor AirLand Battle Future, can be enhanced by the use of space systems. It describes the current Army space infrastructure and makes a determination as to its effectiveness in integrating space into the Army's day to day operations. The Army already uses space technology to some extent in its operations. Examples cited from America's recent conflicts, particularly those from Operation DESERT STORM, indicate that the Army recognizes the utility of space assets and is endeavoring to find ways to effectively use them. The study concludes that the Army should be tactical and operational user of space services, not a strategic operation of space systems, but that it does not yet fully accept that situation. Consequently, Army space operations remain somewhat unfocused, with emphasis shifting between support of national strategic requirements and the needs of the Army's operational and tactical level AirLand Battle commanders.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study investigates how well the potential of space technology is incorporated by the Army into its warfighting doctrine. The study examines the potential benefits of space systems for the military, focusing on Communications, Navigation, Reconnaissance and Surveillance, and Weather support. It evaluates which aspects of the warfighting doctrines, both AirLand Battle and its successor AirLand Battle Future, can be enhanced by the use of space systems. It describes the current Army space infrastructure and makes a determination as to its effectiveness in integrating space into the Army's day to day operations. The Army already uses space technology to some extent in its operations. Examples cited from America's recent conflicts, particularly those from Operation DESERT STORM, indicate that the Army recognizes the utility of space assets and is endeavoring to find ways to effectively use them. The study concludes that the Army should be tactical and operational user of space services, not a strategic operation of space systems, but that it does not yet fully accept that situation. Consequently, Army space operations remain somewhat unfocused, with emphasis shifting between support of national strategic requirements and the needs of the Army's operational and tactical level AirLand Battle commanders.

Key concepts: Battle, Space (punctuation), Military doctrine, Military tactics, Combat readiness, Doctrine, Military strategy, Operations research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Space and the Airland Battle — Research Paper | ScholarLens