2020Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

The EUs cumbersome investment law and policy, and its effects on the protection of intellectual property rights

Szilárd Gáspár-Szilágyi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The extension of the EU’s exclusive competences over foreign direct investment, instead of being a smooth operation meant to streamline the investment policies of the Member States into one common EU investment policy, has turned into an arduous process of legal and political hurdles. The purpose of this chapter is to explain the ways in which the EU’s cumbersome investment law and policy can affect the protection of the intellectual property (IP) rights of EU investors abroad, by focusing on the following core issues: (a) the fate of Member State bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with third countries following the Lisbon amendments; (b) the conclusion of new EU trade and investment agreements; (c) the compatibility of intra-EU BITs with EU Law; and (d) the compatibility between the Investment Court System and investment tribunals under Member State BITs with third countries and EU law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The extension of the EU’s exclusive competences over foreign direct investment, instead of being a smooth operation meant to streamline the investment policies of the Member States into one common EU investment policy, has turned into an arduous process of legal and political hurdles. The purpose of this chapter is to explain the ways in which the EU’s cumbersome investment law and policy can affect the protection of the intellectual property (IP) rights of EU investors abroad, by focusing on the following core issues: (a) the fate of Member State bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with third countries following the Lisbon amendments; (b) the conclusion of new EU trade and investment agreements; (c) the compatibility of intra-EU BITs with EU Law; and (d) the compatibility between the Investment Court System and investment tribunals under Member State BITs with third countries and EU law.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The extension of the EU’s exclusive competences over foreign direct investment, instead of being a smooth operation meant to streamline the investment policies of the Member States into one common EU investment policy, has turned into an arduous process of legal and political hurdles. The purpose of this chapter is to explain the ways in which the EU’s cumbersome investment law and policy can affect the protection of the intellectual property (IP) rights of EU investors abroad, by focusing on the following core issues: (a) the fate of Member State bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with third countries following the Lisbon amendments; (b) the conclusion of new EU trade and investment agreements; (c) the compatibility of intra-EU BITs with EU Law; and (d) the compatibility between the Investment Court System and investment tribunals under Member State BITs with third countries and EU law.

Key concepts: Foreign direct investment, Intellectual property, Investment protection, Investment policy, Member state, Investment (military), Open-ended investment company, Member states

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The EUs cumbersome investment law and policy, and its effects on the protection of intellectual property rights — Research Paper | ScholarLens