Bounded Rationality: Cognitive Limitations or Adaptation to the Environment? The Implications of Ecological Rationality for Management Learning
José Lejarraga, Maud Pindard‐Lejarraga
Abstract
José Lejarraga, Maud Pindard‐Lejarraga
Abstract
We examine why bounded rationality continues to be considered an inferior form of rationallity in the field of management and what this implies for business education and practice. We develop a critique of the dominant and widespread conceptualization of heuristics as flawed and error-prone and argue that this poses unnecessary constraints for the field of management. We discuss consequences of that interpretation of bounded rationality and propose ecological rationality as an alternative, positive interpretation. Ecological rationality considers a decision maker’s environment and aims to identify how and when heuristics generate good outcomes. Evidence suggests that heuristics perform best when problems are ill-defined, many information cues are available, but they are not equally valuable, and there are many possible courses of action, that is, in the uncertain environments that are characteristic of managerial decision making. We contribute by (1) highlighting the distinctiveness of the ecological rationality framework for management learning, (2) acknowledging how it can help rehabilitate bounded rationality in the field of management against its widespread characterization as an inferior form of rationality; and (3) by identifying how it can provide practicable recommendations for managerial learning and decision making.
OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We examine why bounded rationality continues to be considered an inferior form of rationallity in the field of management and what this implies for business education and practice. We develop a critique of the dominant and widespread conceptualization of heuristics as flawed and error-prone and argue that this poses unnecessary constraints for the field of management. We discuss consequences of that interpretation of bounded rationality and propose ecological rationality as an alternative, positive interpretation. Ecological rationality considers a decision maker’s environment and aims to identify how and when heuristics generate good outcomes. Evidence suggests that heuristics perform best when problems are ill-defined, many information cues are available, but they are not equally valuable, and there are many possible courses of action, that is, in the uncertain environments that are characteristic of managerial decision making. We contribute by (1) highlighting the distinctiveness of the ecological rationality framework for management learning, (2) acknowledging how it can help rehabilitate bounded rationality in the field of management against its widespread characterization as an inferior form of rationality; and (3) by identifying how it can provide practicable recommendations for managerial learning and decision making.
Key concepts: Bounded rationality, Rationality, Ecological rationality, Adaptation (eye), Cognition, Bounded function, Psychology, Ecology