2005World Journal of Pharmaceutical and life sciencesRequires access

COMPARATIVE ANTIMICROBIAL STUDY OF A LOCALLY PRODUCED DISINFECTANT AND SOME COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE DISINFECTANTS AGAINST SOME CLINICAL ISOLATES

Peace O. Oleghe, K Agholor, F. Olusola Lucy, S Racheal, J E Oboh

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The main goal of the present study was to determine the efficacy of five routinely used disinfectants and a locally produced one against some selected clinical isolates. The disinfectants used in this study were Roberts® antiseptic disinfectant, Tetmosol® Protect Plus antiseptic disinfectant, Izal® liquid germicide disinfectant, Ivy’s antiseptic®, Dettol® antiseptic disinfectant and a locally produced antiseptic. The test organisms used in this study were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Campylobacter jejuni and Candida albicans. Agar well diffusion method was used to test the antibacterial activity of the various antiseptic/disinfectant at different concentrations (100%, 50% and 25%) as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. The results obtained from this study showed that the test organisms vary in their responses to each of the disinfectant, although all five pathogens were sensitive to Izal® and Roberts® antiseptic at different concentrations. On the other hand, Izal® and Tetmosol® Protect Plus gave…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The main goal of the present study was to determine the efficacy of five routinely used disinfectants and a locally produced one against some selected clinical isolates. The disinfectants used in this study were Roberts® antiseptic disinfectant, Tetmosol® Protect Plus antiseptic disinfectant, Izal® liquid germicide disinfectant, Ivy’s antiseptic®, Dettol® antiseptic disinfectant and a locally produced antiseptic. The test organisms used in this study were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Campylobacter jejuni and Candida albicans. Agar well diffusion method was used to test the antibacterial activity of the various antiseptic/disinfectant at different concentrations (100%, 50% and 25%) as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. The results obtained from this study showed that the test organisms vary in their responses to each of the disinfectant, although all five pathogens were sensitive to Izal® and Roberts® antiseptic at different concentrations. On the other hand, Izal® and Tetmosol® Protect Plus gave…

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The main goal of the present study was to determine the efficacy of five routinely used disinfectants and a locally produced one against some selected clinical isolates. The disinfectants used in this study were Roberts® antiseptic disinfectant, Tetmosol® Protect Plus antiseptic disinfectant, Izal® liquid germicide disinfectant, Ivy’s antiseptic®, Dettol® antiseptic disinfectant and a locally produced antiseptic. The test organisms used in this study were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Campylobacter jejuni and Candida albicans. Agar well diffusion method was used to test the antibacterial activity of the various antiseptic/disinfectant at different concentrations (100%, 50% and 25%) as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. The results obtained from this study showed that the test organisms vary in their responses to each of the disinfectant, although all five pathogens were sensitive to Izal® and Roberts® antiseptic at different concentrations. On the other hand, Izal® and Tetmosol® Protect Plus gave…

Key concepts: Disinfectant, Antiseptic, Candida albicans, Microbiology, Antimicrobial, Staphylococcus aureus, Medicine, Bacteria

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARATIVE ANTIMICROBIAL STUDY OF A LOCALLY PRODUCED DISINFECTANT AND SOME COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE DISINFECTANTS AGAINST SOME CLINICAL ISOLATES — Research Paper | ScholarLens