2020Frontiers in PsychologyOpen access

Attentional Differences as a Function of Rock Climbing Performance

Inmaculada Garrido-Palomino, Simon Fryer, David Giles, Javier J. González-Rosa, Vanesa España‐Romero

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between attention (using two different attention task) and self-reported climbing ability whilst considering potential confounding factors [sex, age, climbing experience and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)] in a group of experienced climbers. Accuracy of response (AC) and reaction time (RT) from two different attention tasks using the Vienna Test System, along with self-reported on-sight and red-point climbing ability, were assessed in thirty-five climbers. Linear regression revealed that climbers with the highest self-reported on-sight grade had better AC during the attention task. Linear regression models revealed, after controlling for potential confounders, that AC, measured using two attention tasks, was positively related to climbers’ highest self-reported on-sight climbing ability (β: 0.388; p: 0.031). No significant differences were found between AC and self-reported red-point climbing ability (β: 0.286; p: 0.064). No significant relationship was found between RT and climbing ability (β: -0.102 to 0.020; p: 0.064). In conclusion, higher level rock climbers appear to have an enhanced attention which is related to on-sight lead climbing style, and thus it may be an important component of climbing performance. Coaches should consider incorporating techniques to train attention based on on-sight climbing style in climbers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between attention (using two different attention task) and self-reported climbing ability whilst considering potential confounding factors [sex, age, climbing experience and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)] in a group of experienced climbers. Accuracy of response (AC) and reaction time (RT) from two different attention tasks using the Vienna Test System, along with self-reported on-sight and red-point climbing ability, were assessed in thirty-five climbers. Linear regression revealed that climbers with the highest self-reported on-sight grade had better AC during the attention task. Linear regression models revealed, after controlling for potential confounders, that AC, measured using two attention tasks, was positively related to climbers’ highest self-reported on-sight climbing ability (β: 0.388; p: 0.031). No significant differences were found between AC and self-reported red-point climbing ability (β: 0.286; p: 0.064). No significant relationship was found between RT and climbing ability (β: -0.102 to 0.020; p: 0.064). In conclusion, higher level rock climbers appear to have an enhanced attention which is related to on-sight lead climbing style, and thus it may be an important component of climbing performance. Coaches should consider incorporating techniques to train attention based on on-sight climbing style in climbers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between attention (using two different attention task) and self-reported climbing ability whilst considering potential confounding factors [sex, age, climbing experience and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)] in a group of experienced climbers. Accuracy of response (AC) and reaction time (RT) from two different attention tasks using the Vienna Test System, along with self-reported on-sight and red-point climbing ability, were assessed in thirty-five climbers. Linear regression revealed that climbers with the highest self-reported on-sight grade had better AC during the attention task. Linear regression models revealed, after controlling for potential confounders, that AC, measured using two attention tasks, was positively related to climbers’ highest self-reported on-sight climbing ability (β: 0.388; p: 0.031). No significant differences were found between AC and self-reported red-point climbing ability (β: 0.286; p: 0.064). No significant relationship was found between RT and climbing ability (β: -0.102 to 0.020; p: 0.064). In conclusion, higher level rock climbers appear to have an enhanced attention which is related to on-sight lead climbing style, and thus it may be an important component of climbing performance. Coaches should consider incorporating techniques to train attention based on on-sight climbing style in climbers.

Key concepts: Climbing, Confounding, Sight, Psychology, Cardiorespiratory fitness, Linear regression, Test (biology), Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Attentional Differences as a Function of Rock Climbing Performance — Research Paper | ScholarLens