2009New York Law School’s Digital Commons (New York Law School)Open access

Preserving Attorney-Client Privilege in the Age of Electronic Discovery

Anthony Francis Bruno

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

See Laura Catherine Daniel, Note, The Dubious Origins and Dangers of Clawback and Quick-Peek Agreements: An Argument Against Their Codification in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 47 Wm.& Mary L. Rev. 663, 673-74 (2005).also In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F.3d 910 (8th Cir.1997).The privilege protects clients, that is, persons who consult with lawyers to obtain professional legal services and/or advice.Weinstein & Berger, § 503.01 (stating the text of United States Supreme Court Standard 503, which Congress declined to adopt as Federal Rule of Evidence 503).34.United States Supreme Court Standard 503, quoted in Weinstein & Berger, supra note 33, § 503.01.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

See Laura Catherine Daniel, Note, The Dubious Origins and Dangers of Clawback and Quick-Peek Agreements: An Argument Against Their Codification in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 47 Wm.& Mary L. Rev. 663, 673-74 (2005).also In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F.3d 910 (8th Cir.1997).The privilege protects clients, that is, persons who consult with lawyers to obtain professional legal services and/or advice.Weinstein & Berger, § 503.01 (stating the text of United States Supreme Court Standard 503, which Congress declined to adopt as Federal Rule of Evidence 503).34.United States Supreme Court Standard 503, quoted in Weinstein & Berger, supra note 33, § 503.01.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

See Laura Catherine Daniel, Note, The Dubious Origins and Dangers of Clawback and Quick-Peek Agreements: An Argument Against Their Codification in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 47 Wm.& Mary L. Rev. 663, 673-74 (2005).also In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F.3d 910 (8th Cir.1997).The privilege protects clients, that is, persons who consult with lawyers to obtain professional legal services and/or advice.Weinstein & Berger, § 503.01 (stating the text of United States Supreme Court Standard 503, which Congress declined to adopt as Federal Rule of Evidence 503).34.United States Supreme Court Standard 503, quoted in Weinstein & Berger, supra note 33, § 503.01.

Key concepts: Privilege (computing), Internet privacy, Computer security, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preserving Attorney-Client Privilege in the Age of Electronic Discovery — Research Paper | ScholarLens