2010•Facta Universitatis Series Economics and OrganizationOpen access

Reduction of environmental pollution and poverty by contemporary EU environmental policy

Boban S. Stojanovic, Snežana Radukić, Vladan Vučić

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Governments have a special responsibility to provide corrective action in the presence of negative externalities because only governments can establish and enforce legal frameworks for regulating the use of environmental resources and transfer resources in this way that different social groups have unique possibilities in order to eradicate poverty. Unidirectional negative externalities are particularly anti-poor. Many potentially environmentally hazardous activities are unjustified not only because of their negative economic impact but also for environmental and poverty reasons. The conventional economic approach to problems is to perceive them in terms of market failure and the miss-allocation of resources. Subsequently, the remedial or policy perspective is explicit in terms of the need to maximize social welfare. According to this viewpoint, justification for government intervention lies in the higher sustainable yield on natural assets and in the reduction of poverty.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Governments have a special responsibility to provide corrective action in the presence of negative externalities because only governments can establish and enforce legal frameworks for regulating the use of environmental resources and transfer resources in this way that different social groups have unique possibilities in order to eradicate poverty. Unidirectional negative externalities are particularly anti-poor. Many potentially environmentally hazardous activities are unjustified not only because of their negative economic impact but also for environmental and poverty reasons. The conventional economic approach to problems is to perceive them in terms of market failure and the miss-allocation of resources. Subsequently, the remedial or policy perspective is explicit in terms of the need to maximize social welfare. According to this viewpoint, justification for government intervention lies in the higher sustainable yield on natural assets and in the reduction of poverty.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Governments have a special responsibility to provide corrective action in the presence of negative externalities because only governments can establish and enforce legal frameworks for regulating the use of environmental resources and transfer resources in this way that different social groups have unique possibilities in order to eradicate poverty. Unidirectional negative externalities are particularly anti-poor. Many potentially environmentally hazardous activities are unjustified not only because of their negative economic impact but also for environmental and poverty reasons. The conventional economic approach to problems is to perceive them in terms of market failure and the miss-allocation of resources. Subsequently, the remedial or policy perspective is explicit in terms of the need to maximize social welfare. According to this viewpoint, justification for government intervention lies in the higher sustainable yield on natural assets and in the reduction of poverty.

Key concepts: Externality, Poverty, Market failure, Economics, Public economics, Government (linguistics), Intervention (counseling), Natural resource

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reduction of environmental pollution and poverty by contemporary EU environmental policy — Research Paper | ScholarLens