2020•مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهانRequires access

بررسی ارتباط عرض بیولوژیک با بیوتایپ لثه در مراجعین بخش پریودنتیکس دانشکدهی دندانپزشکی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران

Ferena Sayar, Roya ShariatmadarAhmadi رویا شریعتمدار احمدی, Mojtaba Ghaderi Ehsanpour مجتبی قادری احسانپور

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Prior to crown lengthening surgery and/or restorative and prosthetic treatment, it is necessary to know the dimensions of the tooth biologic width. In different studies, the biologic width has been measured in different sites and teeth with a healthy periodontium. In this study, the biologic width was measured in different teeth of the mandibular and maxillary arches, and the effect of periodontal/gingival biotype on biologic width was evaluated.Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 163 teeth in 12 subjects, including five males and seven females with an average age of 28 ± 4 years. After injecting the anesthetic agent, the dimensions of the biologic width were measured using a periodontal probe at six sites in all the existing teeth (except the third molars). Periodontal biotype was evaluated and categorized as thin or thick by observing transgingival shade of a probe. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and t-test using SPSS 19 (α = 0.05).Results: The average biologic widths in the molars, premolars, canines, and incisors were 1.90 ± 0.80, 1.72 ± 0.69, 155 ± 0.72, and 1.49±0.64, respectively. There was a significant relationship between the biologic width and the tooth type (p value = 0.000). However, there was no significant relationship between the biologic width and gingival biotype in six points and different sites of the mouth (p value > 0.08).Conclusion: The biologic width dimension varies in different tooth types. The periodontal biotype has no effect on the biologic width dimension.Key words: Epithelial attachment, Gingiva, Periodontium, Tooth-supporting structures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Prior to crown lengthening surgery and/or restorative and prosthetic treatment, it is necessary to know the dimensions of the tooth biologic width. In different studies, the biologic width has been measured in different sites and teeth with a healthy periodontium. In this study, the biologic width was measured in different teeth of the mandibular and maxillary arches, and the effect of periodontal/gingival biotype on biologic width was evaluated.Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 163 teeth in 12 subjects, including five males and seven females with an average age of 28 ± 4 years. After injecting the anesthetic agent, the dimensions of the biologic width were measured using a periodontal probe at six sites in all the existing teeth (except the third molars). Periodontal biotype was evaluated and categorized as thin or thick by observing transgingival shade of a probe. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and t-test using SPSS 19 (α = 0.05).Results: The average biologic widths in the molars, premolars, canines, and incisors were 1.90 ± 0.80, 1.72 ± 0.69, 155 ± 0.72, and 1.49±0.64, respectively. There was a significant relationship between the biologic width and the tooth type (p value = 0.000). However, there was no significant relationship between the biologic width and gingival biotype in six points and different sites of the mouth (p value > 0.08).Conclusion: The biologic width dimension varies in different tooth types. The periodontal biotype has no effect on the biologic width dimension.Key words: Epithelial attachment, Gingiva, Periodontium, Tooth-supporting structures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Prior to crown lengthening surgery and/or restorative and prosthetic treatment, it is necessary to know the dimensions of the tooth biologic width. In different studies, the biologic width has been measured in different sites and teeth with a healthy periodontium. In this study, the biologic width was measured in different teeth of the mandibular and maxillary arches, and the effect of periodontal/gingival biotype on biologic width was evaluated.Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 163 teeth in 12 subjects, including five males and seven females with an average age of 28 ± 4 years. After injecting the anesthetic agent, the dimensions of the biologic width were measured using a periodontal probe at six sites in all the existing teeth (except the third molars). Periodontal biotype was evaluated and categorized as thin or thick by observing transgingival shade of a probe. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and t-test using SPSS 19 (α = 0.05).Results: The average biologic widths in the molars, premolars, canines, and incisors were 1.90 ± 0.80, 1.72 ± 0.69, 155 ± 0.72, and 1.49±0.64, respectively. There was a significant relationship between the biologic width and the tooth type (p value = 0.000). However, there was no significant relationship between the biologic width and gingival biotype in six points and different sites of the mouth (p value > 0.08).Conclusion: The biologic width dimension varies in different tooth types. The periodontal biotype has no effect on the biologic width dimension.Key words: Epithelial attachment, Gingiva, Periodontium, Tooth-supporting structures.

Key concepts: Dentistry, Medicine, Periodontium, Molar, Periodontal probe, Orthodontics, Crown (dentistry), Mandibular second molar

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
بررسی ارتباط عرض بیولوژیک با بیوتایپ لثه در مراجعین بخش پریودنتیکس دانشکدهی دندانپزشکی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران — Research Paper | ScholarLens