Criminal Profiling Evidence in Criminal Trials
Pascale Chifflet
Abstract
Pascale Chifflet
Abstract
This thesis examines whether criminal profiling should be admitted as evidence in criminal trials. It argues that as it stands, criminal profiling is not a sufficiently unified, validated and reliable discipline for this purpose. Its use in criminal trials offends a number of fundamental principles of evidence admissibility and is unlikely to foster a rational and accurate process of fact discovery.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This thesis examines whether criminal profiling should be admitted as evidence in criminal trials. It argues that as it stands, criminal profiling is not a sufficiently unified, validated and reliable discipline for this purpose. Its use in criminal trials offends a number of fundamental principles of evidence admissibility and is unlikely to foster a rational and accurate process of fact discovery.
Key concepts: Offender profiling, Criminal trial, Profiling (computer programming), Criminal investigation, Criminology, Criminal procedure, Criminal behaviour, Political science