2005arXiv (Cornell University)Open access

How good are RR Lyrae and Cepheids really as Distance Indicators? The\n observational approach

J. Storm

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

A number of recent technical developments, including the Hipparcos satellite,\nthe Hubble Space Telescope fine guidance sensors and long base line near-IR\ninterferometry has made it possible to employ several largely geometrical\nmethods to determine direct distances to RR Lyrae stars and Cepheids. The\ndistance scale now rests on a much firmer basis and the significant differences\nbetween the distances based on RR Lyrae stars (short) and Cepheids (long) to\nthe LMC have been largely eliminated. The effects of metalicity on the RR Lyrae\nperiod-luminosity (PL) relation in the K-band as well as on the Cepheid PL\nrelation appears to be the main remaining issues but even here empirical\nresults are beginning to show convergence. I review here some of these recent\ndevelopments seen from the perspective of the near-IR surface brightness\nmethod.\n

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of recent technical developments, including the Hipparcos satellite,\nthe Hubble Space Telescope fine guidance sensors and long base line near-IR\ninterferometry has made it possible to employ several largely geometrical\nmethods to determine direct distances to RR Lyrae stars and Cepheids. The\ndistance scale now rests on a much firmer basis and the significant differences\nbetween the distances based on RR Lyrae stars (short) and Cepheids (long) to\nthe LMC have been largely eliminated. The effects of metalicity on the RR Lyrae\nperiod-luminosity (PL) relation in the K-band as well as on the Cepheid PL\nrelation appears to be the main remaining issues but even here empirical\nresults are beginning to show convergence. I review here some of these recent\ndevelopments seen from the perspective of the near-IR surface brightness\nmethod.\n

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of recent technical developments, including the Hipparcos satellite,\nthe Hubble Space Telescope fine guidance sensors and long base line near-IR\ninterferometry has made it possible to employ several largely geometrical\nmethods to determine direct distances to RR Lyrae stars and Cepheids. The\ndistance scale now rests on a much firmer basis and the significant differences\nbetween the distances based on RR Lyrae stars (short) and Cepheids (long) to\nthe LMC have been largely eliminated. The effects of metalicity on the RR Lyrae\nperiod-luminosity (PL) relation in the K-band as well as on the Cepheid PL\nrelation appears to be the main remaining issues but even here empirical\nresults are beginning to show convergence. I review here some of these recent\ndevelopments seen from the perspective of the near-IR surface brightness\nmethod.\n

Key concepts: Cepheid variable, RR Lyrae variable, Astrophysics, Physics, Variable star, Astronomy, Stars, Brightness

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How good are RR Lyrae and Cepheids really as Distance Indicators? The\n observational approach — Research Paper | ScholarLens