2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Sun Yat-sen and Political Democracy

A. James Gregor

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The fact that China was overwhelmed by Maoism had little to do with the vigor or coherence of its revolutionary Marxism. Massive disorder, hyperinflation, institutional failings, civil strife, foreign invasion, and the displacement of vast populations bred the desperation and the search for stability and security that opened the passage to Mao Zedong and his followers. Whatever Mao’s ideas, they were not even clear to Western sinologists, many of whom dismissed the notion that Mao might be anything other than an agrarian reformer—or had any intention of imposing his own variant of Stalinism on the Chinese people. Certainly there were few who believed he would attempt “proletarian dictatorship” in so backward an environment as mainland China.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The fact that China was overwhelmed by Maoism had little to do with the vigor or coherence of its revolutionary Marxism. Massive disorder, hyperinflation, institutional failings, civil strife, foreign invasion, and the displacement of vast populations bred the desperation and the search for stability and security that opened the passage to Mao Zedong and his followers. Whatever Mao’s ideas, they were not even clear to Western sinologists, many of whom dismissed the notion that Mao might be anything other than an agrarian reformer—or had any intention of imposing his own variant of Stalinism on the Chinese people. Certainly there were few who believed he would attempt “proletarian dictatorship” in so backward an environment as mainland China.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The fact that China was overwhelmed by Maoism had little to do with the vigor or coherence of its revolutionary Marxism. Massive disorder, hyperinflation, institutional failings, civil strife, foreign invasion, and the displacement of vast populations bred the desperation and the search for stability and security that opened the passage to Mao Zedong and his followers. Whatever Mao’s ideas, they were not even clear to Western sinologists, many of whom dismissed the notion that Mao might be anything other than an agrarian reformer—or had any intention of imposing his own variant of Stalinism on the Chinese people. Certainly there were few who believed he would attempt “proletarian dictatorship” in so backward an environment as mainland China.

Key concepts: Democracy, Politics, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sun Yat-sen and Political Democracy — Research Paper | ScholarLens