2020Nephrology Dialysis TransplantationRequires access

P1231ASSISTED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IN ESRD PATIENTS

Jelena Tosic Dragovic, Nada Dimković, Zdenka Majster, Tatjana Damjanović, Ana Bulatović, Radomir Naumović

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Peritoneal dialysis is an important form of treatment for patients with end stage chronic kidney failure requiring renal replacement therapy but its use may be limitted by growing number of elderly and disabled patients. Often, they choose an assisted peritoneal dialysis (assCAPD) as first option, that can be performed by relative or a nurs. The aim of this research was to analyse differences between two groups of patients (CAPD vs. assCAPD) in order to establish if two variants are comparable in regard of patients outcome. Method We analysed 61 patient divided into two groups (ass CAPD, N= 16 and CAPD, N= 45) who were dialysed in Zvezdara University hospital for more than 3 months and correlated number of peritonitis, exit site infections and overall mortality rates between two groups during the period of 60 months. Assistance was provided on the volontary basis by family member. Results Patients in assCAPD group were unsignificantly older (68+11vs. 60 + 12 years) and had higher comorbidity score. The groups were homogeneous according the presence of diabetes mellitus, CRP and PTH levels. There were no significant difference between the two of groups in the number of peritonitis (p=0,77), exit site infections (p=0,37) and overall survival (p= 0,74, Figure 1.). Conclusion Family member provides very good assistance in peritoneal dialysis giving the results that are comparable to that of self-performing CAPD patients. This is therefore very successful treatmen option for a special population of ESRD patients who can not performe CAPD on their own.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Background and Aims Peritoneal dialysis is an important form of treatment for patients with end stage chronic kidney failure requiring renal replacement therapy but its use may be limitted by growing number of elderly and disabled patients. Often, they choose an assisted peritoneal dialysis (assCAPD) as first option, that can be performed by relative or a nurs. The aim of this research was to analyse differences between two groups of patients (CAPD vs. assCAPD) in order to establish if two variants are comparable in regard of patients outcome. Method We analysed 61 patient divided into two groups (ass CAPD, N= 16 and CAPD, N= 45) who were dialysed in Zvezdara University hospital for more than 3 months and correlated number of peritonitis, exit site infections and overall mortality rates between two groups during the period of 60 months. Assistance was provided on the volontary basis by family member. Results Patients in assCAPD group were unsignificantly older (68+11vs. 60 + 12 years) and had higher comorbidity score. The groups were homogeneous according the presence of diabetes mellitus, CRP and PTH levels. There were no significant difference between the two of groups in the number of peritonitis (p=0,77), exit site infections (p=0,37) and overall survival (p= 0,74, Figure 1.). Conclusion Family member provides very good assistance in peritoneal dialysis giving the results that are comparable to that of self-performing CAPD patients. This is therefore very successful treatmen option for a special population of ESRD patients who can not performe CAPD on their own.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Peritoneal dialysis is an important form of treatment for patients with end stage chronic kidney failure requiring renal replacement therapy but its use may be limitted by growing number of elderly and disabled patients. Often, they choose an assisted peritoneal dialysis (assCAPD) as first option, that can be performed by relative or a nurs. The aim of this research was to analyse differences between two groups of patients (CAPD vs. assCAPD) in order to establish if two variants are comparable in regard of patients outcome. Method We analysed 61 patient divided into two groups (ass CAPD, N= 16 and CAPD, N= 45) who were dialysed in Zvezdara University hospital for more than 3 months and correlated number of peritonitis, exit site infections and overall mortality rates between two groups during the period of 60 months. Assistance was provided on the volontary basis by family member. Results Patients in assCAPD group were unsignificantly older (68+11vs. 60 + 12 years) and had higher comorbidity score. The groups were homogeneous according the presence of diabetes mellitus, CRP and PTH levels. There were no significant difference between the two of groups in the number of peritonitis (p=0,77), exit site infections (p=0,37) and overall survival (p= 0,74, Figure 1.). Conclusion Family member provides very good assistance in peritoneal dialysis giving the results that are comparable to that of self-performing CAPD patients. This is therefore very successful treatmen option for a special population of ESRD patients who can not performe CAPD on their own.

Key concepts: Medicine, Peritoneal dialysis, Peritonitis, Renal replacement therapy, Dialysis, Comorbidity, Diabetes mellitus, Hemodialysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
P1231ASSISTED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IN ESRD PATIENTS — Research Paper | ScholarLens