ScholarLens Back to search
2020•Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg)Requires access

Opinion Statement ECJ TF 4/2019 on the ECJ Decision of 26 February 2019 in X-GmbH (Case C-135/17), Concerning the Application of the German CFC Legislation in Relation to Third Countries

Werner Christof Haslehner, Alfredo García Prats, Volker Heydt, Eric C.C.M. Kemmeren, Georg Kofler, Michael Lang, Jürgen Lüdicke, João Félix Pinto Nogueira, Pasquale Pistone, Albert J. Rädler, Stella Raventós-Calvo, Isabelle Richelle, Emmanuel Raingeard de la Blétière, Alexander Rust, Rupert Shiers

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

peer reviewed

About this research paper

What this paper is about

peer reviewed

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

peer reviewed

Key concepts: German, Statement (logic), Legislation, Relation (database), Law, Political science, Business, Law and economics

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Opinion Statement ECJ TF 4/2019 on the ECJ Decision of 26 February 2019 in X-GmbH (Case C-135/17), Concerning the Application of the German CFC Legislation in Relation to Third Countries — Research Paper | ScholarLens