2018JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCHOpen access

Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Closed Tray and Open Tray Impression Technique for Dental Implants using Two Different Impression Materials

Arpita Tandon, Nilesh Bulbule, Amit Jagtap, Dilip Kakade

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Introduction: In the era of fixed prosthodontics where implant restorations are being routinely used, it is imperative for the dentist to correctly record the position and orientation of the implant. This necessitates the application of correct impression procedure, impression material and accurate die materials. Aim: This study aims at evaluating and comparing the effect of closed tray and open tray impression technique with polyvinyl siloxane and polyether as impression materials on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts. Materials and Methods: This in vitro study is about implant definitive casts made using the open tray and closed tray impression technique using two different impression materials i.e., polyvinyl siloxane and polyether. The Co-ordinate measuring machine was used to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of the casts, then tested at the Tata Autocomponents-Interiors and Plastic Division (IPD), Pune. A total of 60 implant definitive casts were made. A total of 30 casts were made using each impression technique. These casts were further subgrouped wherein, 15 casts were made using polyvinyl siloxane as the impression material and 15 casts were made using polyether. The unpaired t-test was used for comparison. Results: Both the open tray and closed tray impression technique are comparable to each other and there is no statistically significant difference between the two. Also, the impression materials are equally good for impression making of implants (p>0.05). Conclusion: Either of the impression techniques and material used in the study can be used to make implant definitive casts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: In the era of fixed prosthodontics where implant restorations are being routinely used, it is imperative for the dentist to correctly record the position and orientation of the implant. This necessitates the application of correct impression procedure, impression material and accurate die materials. Aim: This study aims at evaluating and comparing the effect of closed tray and open tray impression technique with polyvinyl siloxane and polyether as impression materials on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts. Materials and Methods: This in vitro study is about implant definitive casts made using the open tray and closed tray impression technique using two different impression materials i.e., polyvinyl siloxane and polyether. The Co-ordinate measuring machine was used to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of the casts, then tested at the Tata Autocomponents-Interiors and Plastic Division (IPD), Pune. A total of 60 implant definitive casts were made. A total of 30 casts were made using each impression technique. These casts were further subgrouped wherein, 15 casts were made using polyvinyl siloxane as the impression material and 15 casts were made using polyether. The unpaired t-test was used for comparison. Results: Both the open tray and closed tray impression technique are comparable to each other and there is no statistically significant difference between the two. Also, the impression materials are equally good for impression making of implants (p>0.05). Conclusion: Either of the impression techniques and material used in the study can be used to make implant definitive casts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: In the era of fixed prosthodontics where implant restorations are being routinely used, it is imperative for the dentist to correctly record the position and orientation of the implant. This necessitates the application of correct impression procedure, impression material and accurate die materials. Aim: This study aims at evaluating and comparing the effect of closed tray and open tray impression technique with polyvinyl siloxane and polyether as impression materials on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts. Materials and Methods: This in vitro study is about implant definitive casts made using the open tray and closed tray impression technique using two different impression materials i.e., polyvinyl siloxane and polyether. The Co-ordinate measuring machine was used to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of the casts, then tested at the Tata Autocomponents-Interiors and Plastic Division (IPD), Pune. A total of 60 implant definitive casts were made. A total of 30 casts were made using each impression technique. These casts were further subgrouped wherein, 15 casts were made using polyvinyl siloxane as the impression material and 15 casts were made using polyether. The unpaired t-test was used for comparison. Results: Both the open tray and closed tray impression technique are comparable to each other and there is no statistically significant difference between the two. Also, the impression materials are equally good for impression making of implants (p>0.05). Conclusion: Either of the impression techniques and material used in the study can be used to make implant definitive casts.

Key concepts: Impression, Tray, Dentistry, Orthodontics, Computer science, Medicine, Engineering, Mechanical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Closed Tray and Open Tray Impression Technique for Dental Implants using Two Different Impression Materials — Research Paper | ScholarLens