2018Zhonghua jianyan yixue zazhiRequires access

The differential diagnostic value of pleural effusion heparin-binding protein in parapneumonic effusion

Li Zhang, Yongfeng Bai, Jiang Jun-mei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of pleural effusion heparin-binding protein(HBP)in differential diagnosis of parapneumonic effusion. Methods Case-control study. The pleural effusion of 189 patients with pleural effusion admitted to Quzhou People′s Hospital from February to July 2018, including parapneumonic effusion (n=72), tuberculous pleural effusion(n=24), cases of malignant pleural effusion (n=46) and transudative pleural effusion (n=47) were collected. Routine analysis, lactate dehydrogenase(LDH), adenosine deaminase (ADA) and total protein(TP)examination of all pleural effusions were performed. The levels of heparin-binding protein in the patients′ pleural fluid were measured by ELISA. The difference in the overall level of each group was determined by One-way ANOVA or LSD test followed by Kruskal-Wallis H test dependence on the homogeneity of variances. The categorical data was analyzed by chi-square test.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the diagnostic value of heparin-binding protein for parapneumonic effusion. Results The concentration of heparin-binding protein was low in malignant pleural effusion[15.2(8.4, 33.3)ng/ml]and transudative effusion[14.1(6.5, 23.0)ng/ml], but high in parapneumonic effusion[316.1(99.5, 399.8)ng/ml]and tuberculous pleurisy[64.7 (18.6, 96.8) ng/ml]. The heparin-binding protein level in parapneumonic effusion was significantly different from the other three groups (H=120.3, P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for an optimal discrimination between parapneumonic effusion from non-parapneumonic effusion could be performed at a cut-off point of 64.2 ng/ml with area under the curve of 0.953[sensitivity: 88.9%(64/72), specificity: 89.7%(105/117), positive predictive value: 84.2%(64/76), negative predictive value: 92.9%(105/113)]. Conclusions Heparin-binding proteinin pleural fluid is effective to be used to classify parapneumonic effusion samples. The detection of heparin-binding protein in pleural effusion has good sensitivity and specificity. It could be a biomarker for differential diagnosis of parapneumonic effusion.(Chin J Lab Med, 2018, 41: 853-857) Key words: Hydrothorax; Blood proteins; Carrier protein; Antimicrobial cationic peptides; Pneumonia; Pleural effusion; Diagnosis, differential

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of pleural effusion heparin-binding protein(HBP)in differential diagnosis of parapneumonic effusion. Methods Case-control study. The pleural effusion of 189 patients with pleural effusion admitted to Quzhou People′s Hospital from February to July 2018, including parapneumonic effusion (n=72), tuberculous pleural effusion(n=24), cases of malignant pleural effusion (n=46) and transudative pleural effusion (n=47) were collected. Routine analysis, lactate dehydrogenase(LDH), adenosine deaminase (ADA) and total protein(TP)examination of all pleural effusions were performed. The levels of heparin-binding protein in the patients′ pleural fluid were measured by ELISA. The difference in the overall level of each group was determined by One-way ANOVA or LSD test followed by Kruskal-Wallis H test dependence on the homogeneity of variances. The categorical data was analyzed by chi-square test.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the diagnostic value of heparin-binding protein for parapneumonic effusion. Results The concentration of heparin-binding protein was low in malignant pleural effusion[15.2(8.4, 33.3)ng/ml]and transudative effusion[14.1(6.5, 23.0)ng/ml], but high in parapneumonic effusion[316.1(99.5, 399.8)ng/ml]and tuberculous pleurisy[64.7 (18.6, 96.8) ng/ml]. The heparin-binding protein level in parapneumonic effusion was significantly different from the other three groups (H=120.3, P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for an optimal discrimination between parapneumonic effusion from non-parapneumonic effusion could be performed at a cut-off point of 64.2 ng/ml with area under the curve of 0.953[sensitivity: 88.9%(64/72), specificity: 89.7%(105/117), positive predictive value: 84.2%(64/76), negative predictive value: 92.9%(105/113)]. Conclusions Heparin-binding proteinin pleural fluid is effective to be used to classify parapneumonic effusion samples. The detection of heparin-binding protein in pleural effusion has good sensitivity and specificity. It could be a biomarker for differential diagnosis of parapneumonic effusion.(Chin J Lab Med, 2018, 41: 853-857) Key words: Hydrothorax; Blood proteins; Carrier protein; Antimicrobial cationic peptides; Pneumonia; Pleural effusion; Diagnosis, differential

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of pleural effusion heparin-binding protein(HBP)in differential diagnosis of parapneumonic effusion. Methods Case-control study. The pleural effusion of 189 patients with pleural effusion admitted to Quzhou People′s Hospital from February to July 2018, including parapneumonic effusion (n=72), tuberculous pleural effusion(n=24), cases of malignant pleural effusion (n=46) and transudative pleural effusion (n=47) were collected. Routine analysis, lactate dehydrogenase(LDH), adenosine deaminase (ADA) and total protein(TP)examination of all pleural effusions were performed. The levels of heparin-binding protein in the patients′ pleural fluid were measured by ELISA. The difference in the overall level of each group was determined by One-way ANOVA or LSD test followed by Kruskal-Wallis H test dependence on the homogeneity of variances. The categorical data was analyzed by chi-square test.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the diagnostic value of heparin-binding protein for parapneumonic effusion. Results The concentration of heparin-binding protein was low in malignant pleural effusion[15.2(8.4, 33.3)ng/ml]and transudative effusion[14.1(6.5, 23.0)ng/ml], but high in parapneumonic effusion[316.1(99.5, 399.8)ng/ml]and tuberculous pleurisy[64.7 (18.6, 96.8) ng/ml]. The heparin-binding protein level in parapneumonic effusion was significantly different from the other three groups (H=120.3, P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for an optimal discrimination between parapneumonic effusion from non-parapneumonic effusion could be performed at a cut-off point of 64.2 ng/ml with area under the curve of 0.953[sensitivity: 88.9%(64/72), specificity: 89.7%(105/117), positive predictive value: 84.2%(64/76), negative predictive value: 92.9%(105/113)]. Conclusions Heparin-binding proteinin pleural fluid is effective to be used to classify parapneumonic effusion samples. The detection of heparin-binding protein in pleural effusion has good sensitivity and specificity. It could be a biomarker for differential diagnosis of parapneumonic effusion.(Chin J Lab Med, 2018, 41: 853-857) Key words: Hydrothorax; Blood proteins; Carrier protein; Antimicrobial cationic peptides; Pneumonia; Pleural effusion; Diagnosis, differential

Key concepts: Parapneumonic effusion, Medicine, Pleural effusion, Effusion, Receiver operating characteristic, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The differential diagnostic value of pleural effusion heparin-binding protein in parapneumonic effusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens