2015Zhongguo jiceng yiyaoRequires access

The prospective randomized controlled study of primary pterygium surgery

Hua Feng, Zhengyi Li, Jimeng Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study two different methods in treatment of primary pterygium surgery on corneal epithelial wound repair and the influence on the recurrence rate. Methods Used prospective controlled study, according to a number table 128 patients with 128 eyes were randomly divided into control group (64 cases), and observation group (64 cases). The two groups of patients underwent pterygium excision and limbal stem cell transplantation.The observation group (64 eyes) received 0.2 mg/mL mitomycin C of mitomycin-C(MMC) adjuvant therapy.Corneal epithelial wound repair speed was observed.The patients were followed up for 6-12 months, average 8.5months, the recurrence rate of pterygium was observed in the two groups. Results The grafts were smooth, and the conjunctival flap healed well in the two groups.The postoperative corneal epithelial healing time of the control group and the observation group were (2.13±0.37)d, (2.87±0.41)d, there was statistically significant difference (t=4.91, P 0.05). Conclusion There was no difference in recurrence rate between two kinds of pterygium surgical method, but the combined MMC can cause corneal epithelial healing delay. Key words: Pterygium; Limbal stem cell; Transplantation; Mitomycin C

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study two different methods in treatment of primary pterygium surgery on corneal epithelial wound repair and the influence on the recurrence rate. Methods Used prospective controlled study, according to a number table 128 patients with 128 eyes were randomly divided into control group (64 cases), and observation group (64 cases). The two groups of patients underwent pterygium excision and limbal stem cell transplantation.The observation group (64 eyes) received 0.2 mg/mL mitomycin C of mitomycin-C(MMC) adjuvant therapy.Corneal epithelial wound repair speed was observed.The patients were followed up for 6-12 months, average 8.5months, the recurrence rate of pterygium was observed in the two groups. Results The grafts were smooth, and the conjunctival flap healed well in the two groups.The postoperative corneal epithelial healing time of the control group and the observation group were (2.13±0.37)d, (2.87±0.41)d, there was statistically significant difference (t=4.91, P 0.05). Conclusion There was no difference in recurrence rate between two kinds of pterygium surgical method, but the combined MMC can cause corneal epithelial healing delay. Key words: Pterygium; Limbal stem cell; Transplantation; Mitomycin C

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study two different methods in treatment of primary pterygium surgery on corneal epithelial wound repair and the influence on the recurrence rate. Methods Used prospective controlled study, according to a number table 128 patients with 128 eyes were randomly divided into control group (64 cases), and observation group (64 cases). The two groups of patients underwent pterygium excision and limbal stem cell transplantation.The observation group (64 eyes) received 0.2 mg/mL mitomycin C of mitomycin-C(MMC) adjuvant therapy.Corneal epithelial wound repair speed was observed.The patients were followed up for 6-12 months, average 8.5months, the recurrence rate of pterygium was observed in the two groups. Results The grafts were smooth, and the conjunctival flap healed well in the two groups.The postoperative corneal epithelial healing time of the control group and the observation group were (2.13±0.37)d, (2.87±0.41)d, there was statistically significant difference (t=4.91, P 0.05). Conclusion There was no difference in recurrence rate between two kinds of pterygium surgical method, but the combined MMC can cause corneal epithelial healing delay. Key words: Pterygium; Limbal stem cell; Transplantation; Mitomycin C

Key concepts: Pterygium, Medicine, Mitomycin C, Surgery, Significant difference, Wound healing, Transplantation, Corneal transplantation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The prospective randomized controlled study of primary pterygium surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens