Individualized lifestyle intervention on the control of metabolic status of type 2 diabetes and evaluation of patient compliance

Objective To analyze the effects of individualized lifestyle intervention on compliance and metabolic status of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods Two hundred T2DM patients were selected and randomly divided into experimental and control groups of 100 patients respectively.The experimental group was given individualized lifestyle intervention for 6 months in addition to conventional oral medications.The intervention was to prescribe diet control and exercise therapy according to the patients' individual conditions.The control group was given conventional treatment and verbal lifestyle intervention for 6 months.Comparison was made in patients compliance and various metabolic markers between the two groups.Results The percentage of conduction of diet control and exercise therapy in experimental group was significantly higher than control group ( Diet control:80 vs.52,x2=7.08,P=0.029;Exercise therapy:78 vs.44,x2=11.207,P=0.004).After intervention,the fasting plasma glucose (FPG),2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hPG),glycated hemoglobin ( HbA1c),body mass index ( BMI),triglyceride ( TG),total cholesterol (TC),low-density lipoprotein ( LDL-C ),and insulin resistance index ( HOMA-IR ) in experimental group decreased significantly,and high-density lipoprotein ( HDL-C ) increased significantly [FPG:( 8.45 ± 1.46 ) mmol/L vs.(6.66 ± 0.67) mmol/L,P=0.000;2hPG:( 12.76 ± 2.25 ) mmol/L vs.(8.22 ± 1.79) mmol/L,P=0.000;HbA1c:(7.68 ± 1.06 ) ％ vs.( 6.48 ± 0.69 ) ％,P=0.000;BMI:( 25.90 ± 1.72 ) kg/m2 vs.( 22.81 ±1.41 ) kg/m2,P=0.016;TG:(2.57 ±0.68) mmol/Lvs.( 1.88 ±0.35) mmol/L,P=0.006;TC:(5.72 ±0.13) mmol/L vs.(5.14 ± 1.38) mmol/L,P=0.043;LDL-C:(3.28 ±0.10)mmol/L vs.(2.81 ±0.57)mmol/L,P=0.009;HOMA-IR:7.58 ± 0.19 vs.4.58 ± 1.98,P=0.000;HDL-C:( 1.29 ± 0.04) mmol/L vs.( 1.62 ± 0.27 ) mmol/L,P=0.003].The levels of FPG,2hPG,HbA1c,BMI,TG,HOMA-IR also decreased in control group after intervention compared with before intervention [FPG:( 8.67 ± 2.71 ) mmol/L vs.( 7.26 ± 1.21 ) mmol/L,P=0.001;2hPG:( 12.82 ± 2.15 ) mmol/L vs.( 10.85 ± 1.98 ) mmol/L,P=0.000,HbA1c:( 7.75 ± 1.08 ) ％ vs.( 7.01 ± 0.87 ) ％,P=0.002;BMI:( 25.82 ± 1.74 ) kg/m2 vs.( 24.23 ± 1.36 ) kg/m2,P=0.024;TG:(2.47 ±0.75) mmol/L vs.(2.13 ± 0.43 ) mmol/L,P=0.018;HoMA-IR:7.88 ± 0.20 vs.6.15 ± 2.01,P=0.042].No significant difference was found on the values of TC,HDL-C and LDL-C before and after intervention in control group (P ＞ 0.05).The effect of intervention of experimental group was more obvious when compared with control group ( FPG:P=0.036;2hPG:P=0.000;HbA1c:P=0.045;BMI:P=0.037;TG:P=0.022;HoMA-IR:P=0.000).Conclusion Individualized lifestyle intervention can improve the compliance of T2DM patients,and was in favor of control metabolic status of T2DM patients to delay the occurrence and development of complications. Key words: Individualized lifestyle intervention; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Compliance; Metabolic status