Comparison of the imaging effects of SonoVue and Sonazoid at high frequency in rabbit-liver ultrasonography
Longzhong Liu, Wei Zheng, Anhua Li, Yuhong Li, Jianwei Wang
Abstract
Longzhong Liu, Wei Zheng, Anhua Li, Yuhong Li, Jianwei Wang
Abstract
Objective To compare the contrast enhancement effects of SonoVue and Sonazoid in rabbit liver at ultrasonic frequency of 7 MHz using various mechanical index(MI) and dosage. Methods Eight rabbits were bolus injected with different contrast agents:for SonoVue(0. 06 ml/kg,0. 12 ml/kg) ,MI ranging 0. 10 - 0. 55; while Sonazoid (0. 045 ml/kg, 0. 09 ml/kg) , MI ranging 0. 19 - 0. 98. Quantitative analysis of ultrasonography was done using video-intensity analysis system, and peak intensity (PI) was compared. Results With the same frequency, in SonoVue group, for both dosage groups, PI reached maximum at MI = 0. 15 ( P <0. 05) ; with the same MI, PI of the high dosage group was higher ( P < 0. 05). In Sonazoid group,for both dosage groups,PI reached maximum at MI = 0. 40( P <0. 05) ; with the same MI,PI of the high dose group was higher ( P <0. 05). Conclusions The optimistic ultrasonographic conditions provided to SonoVue and Sonazoid are different. Dosage of contrast agents, MI and frequency need to be concerned. Key words: Ultrasonography; Microbubbles; Liver
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the contrast enhancement effects of SonoVue and Sonazoid in rabbit liver at ultrasonic frequency of 7 MHz using various mechanical index(MI) and dosage. Methods Eight rabbits were bolus injected with different contrast agents:for SonoVue(0. 06 ml/kg,0. 12 ml/kg) ,MI ranging 0. 10 - 0. 55; while Sonazoid (0. 045 ml/kg, 0. 09 ml/kg) , MI ranging 0. 19 - 0. 98. Quantitative analysis of ultrasonography was done using video-intensity analysis system, and peak intensity (PI) was compared. Results With the same frequency, in SonoVue group, for both dosage groups, PI reached maximum at MI = 0. 15 ( P <0. 05) ; with the same MI, PI of the high dosage group was higher ( P < 0. 05). In Sonazoid group,for both dosage groups,PI reached maximum at MI = 0. 40( P <0. 05) ; with the same MI,PI of the high dose group was higher ( P <0. 05). Conclusions The optimistic ultrasonographic conditions provided to SonoVue and Sonazoid are different. Dosage of contrast agents, MI and frequency need to be concerned. Key words: Ultrasonography; Microbubbles; Liver
Key concepts: Microbubbles, Medicine, Mechanical index, Ultrasonography, Nuclear medicine, Bolus (digestion), Ultrasound, Significant difference