2019•国际医药卫生导报Requires access

Clinical nursing of super pulse CO2 dot matrix laser and subcision for the treatment of atrophic acne scars

Wenjun Zhang, Ling Lin, Yeqing Gong, Liqian Peng, Peisi Li, Yueming Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the effects of two oral care methods on ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. Methods A total of 1 270 critically ill patients who underwent mechanical ventilation for artificial airway from July 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled. The patients admitted to the ICU were divided into control group (635 cases) and study group (635 cases) by digital randomization. The control group was given conventional oral care; the study group was given special oral care method: the patients in this group applied a double-sided toothbrush + mouthwash that was attracted by the middle hole to brush the teeth and rinse. After brushing, the mouth was cleaned with normal saline or warm water. The oral care outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results The incidences of halitosis, oral ulcer, and VAP in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (2.36% vs.6.30%, 0.94% vs.2.52%, 6.14% vs.20.4%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion The double-sided toothbrush + mouthwash attracted by the middle hole is used for oral care of critically ill patients, which can effectively clean the mouth, reduce halitosis, oral ulcer, and VAP incidence. Key words: Oral care; Critically ill patients; Ventilator-associated pneumonia

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the effects of two oral care methods on ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. Methods A total of 1 270 critically ill patients who underwent mechanical ventilation for artificial airway from July 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled. The patients admitted to the ICU were divided into control group (635 cases) and study group (635 cases) by digital randomization. The control group was given conventional oral care; the study group was given special oral care method: the patients in this group applied a double-sided toothbrush + mouthwash that was attracted by the middle hole to brush the teeth and rinse. After brushing, the mouth was cleaned with normal saline or warm water. The oral care outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results The incidences of halitosis, oral ulcer, and VAP in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (2.36% vs.6.30%, 0.94% vs.2.52%, 6.14% vs.20.4%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion The double-sided toothbrush + mouthwash attracted by the middle hole is used for oral care of critically ill patients, which can effectively clean the mouth, reduce halitosis, oral ulcer, and VAP incidence. Key words: Oral care; Critically ill patients; Ventilator-associated pneumonia

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the effects of two oral care methods on ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. Methods A total of 1 270 critically ill patients who underwent mechanical ventilation for artificial airway from July 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled. The patients admitted to the ICU were divided into control group (635 cases) and study group (635 cases) by digital randomization. The control group was given conventional oral care; the study group was given special oral care method: the patients in this group applied a double-sided toothbrush + mouthwash that was attracted by the middle hole to brush the teeth and rinse. After brushing, the mouth was cleaned with normal saline or warm water. The oral care outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results The incidences of halitosis, oral ulcer, and VAP in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (2.36% vs.6.30%, 0.94% vs.2.52%, 6.14% vs.20.4%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion The double-sided toothbrush + mouthwash attracted by the middle hole is used for oral care of critically ill patients, which can effectively clean the mouth, reduce halitosis, oral ulcer, and VAP incidence. Key words: Oral care; Critically ill patients; Ventilator-associated pneumonia

Key concepts: Medicine, Dentistry, Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Toothbrush, Chlorhexidine, Critically ill, Oral hygiene, Pneumonia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical nursing of super pulse CO2 dot matrix laser and subcision for the treatment of atrophic acne scars — Research Paper | ScholarLens