2018Chineae Journal of Organ TransplantationRequires access

Prognoses of patients with hematological malignancies after haploidentical or HLA-matched sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Haiyan Zhang, Bing Long, Xiaoyun Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and HLA-identical transplantation for hematologic diseases, and analyze risk factors related to overall survival (OS). Methods There were 81 patients with hematological malignancies receiving Allo-HSCT from October, 2011 to July, 2017. The patients were divided into two groups: 30 patients undergoing haploidentical HSCT and 51 cases undergoing matched sibling donor HSCT (MSD-HSCT). Implantations of hematopoietie stem cells, incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD), OS rate, disease free survival (DFS) rate, incidence of relapse and non-relapse-mortality were analyzed statistically. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze the risk factors related to OS. Results All patients achieved sustained engraftment. 100 days after Allo-HSCT, the cumulative incidence for Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD had no significant difference between haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT (56.7% versus 11.8%, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the 1-year cumulative incidence for cGVHD between haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT (20.6% versus 45%, P=0.341). The 2-year OS rate in patients receiving haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT was 63.2% and 78.4% respectively (P=0.078). The 2-year DFS rate in patients receiving haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT was 54.8% and 66.9% respectively (P=0.159). The 2-year relapse and non-relapse-mortality rate in patients receiving haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT was 25.9% and 24%, and 22.9% and 9.5% respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in relapse rate and mortality between two groups (P=0.465, 0.118). Multivariate analysis showed that relapse and Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD were independent prognostic indictors for OS with relative risk 6.671 (95% CI 2.791-15.946) and 3.073 (95% CI 1.296~7.284) (P<0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effects of haploidentical transplantation were similar to those of HLA-identical sibling transplantation. Relapse and Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD after transplantation have prognostic significance for the long-term survival of transplant patients. Key words: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Hematopathy; Prognosis

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the efficacy of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and HLA-identical transplantation for hematologic diseases, and analyze risk factors related to overall survival (OS). Methods There were 81 patients with hematological malignancies receiving Allo-HSCT from October, 2011 to July, 2017. The patients were divided into two groups: 30 patients undergoing haploidentical HSCT and 51 cases undergoing matched sibling donor HSCT (MSD-HSCT). Implantations of hematopoietie stem cells, incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD), OS rate, disease free survival (DFS) rate, incidence of relapse and non-relapse-mortality were analyzed statistically. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze the risk factors related to OS. Results All patients achieved sustained engraftment. 100 days after Allo-HSCT, the cumulative incidence for Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD had no significant difference between haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT (56.7% versus 11.8%, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the 1-year cumulative incidence for cGVHD between haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT (20.6% versus 45%, P=0.341). The 2-year OS rate in patients receiving haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT was 63.2% and 78.4% respectively (P=0.078). The 2-year DFS rate in patients receiving haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT was 54.8% and 66.9% respectively (P=0.159). The 2-year relapse and non-relapse-mortality rate in patients receiving haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT was 25.9% and 24%, and 22.9% and 9.5% respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in relapse rate and mortality between two groups (P=0.465, 0.118). Multivariate analysis showed that relapse and Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD were independent prognostic indictors for OS with relative risk 6.671 (95% CI 2.791-15.946) and 3.073 (95% CI 1.296~7.284) (P<0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effects of haploidentical transplantation were similar to those of HLA-identical sibling transplantation. Relapse and Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD after transplantation have prognostic significance for the long-term survival of transplant patients. Key words: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Hematopathy; Prognosis

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and HLA-identical transplantation for hematologic diseases, and analyze risk factors related to overall survival (OS). Methods There were 81 patients with hematological malignancies receiving Allo-HSCT from October, 2011 to July, 2017. The patients were divided into two groups: 30 patients undergoing haploidentical HSCT and 51 cases undergoing matched sibling donor HSCT (MSD-HSCT). Implantations of hematopoietie stem cells, incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD), OS rate, disease free survival (DFS) rate, incidence of relapse and non-relapse-mortality were analyzed statistically. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze the risk factors related to OS. Results All patients achieved sustained engraftment. 100 days after Allo-HSCT, the cumulative incidence for Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD had no significant difference between haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT (56.7% versus 11.8%, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the 1-year cumulative incidence for cGVHD between haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT (20.6% versus 45%, P=0.341). The 2-year OS rate in patients receiving haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT was 63.2% and 78.4% respectively (P=0.078). The 2-year DFS rate in patients receiving haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT was 54.8% and 66.9% respectively (P=0.159). The 2-year relapse and non-relapse-mortality rate in patients receiving haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT was 25.9% and 24%, and 22.9% and 9.5% respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in relapse rate and mortality between two groups (P=0.465, 0.118). Multivariate analysis showed that relapse and Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD were independent prognostic indictors for OS with relative risk 6.671 (95% CI 2.791-15.946) and 3.073 (95% CI 1.296~7.284) (P<0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effects of haploidentical transplantation were similar to those of HLA-identical sibling transplantation. Relapse and Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD after transplantation have prognostic significance for the long-term survival of transplant patients. Key words: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Hematopathy; Prognosis

Key concepts: Cumulative incidence, Medicine, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Internal medicine, Incidence (geometry), Transplantation, Graft-versus-host disease, Sibling

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prognoses of patients with hematological malignancies after haploidentical or HLA-matched sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation — Research Paper | ScholarLens