2010Guoji yiyao weisheng daobaoRequires access

Comparison of content defects between real-time and summary nursing records

LU Shao-ping, Huigen Huang, Yongneng Xu, Xiao-xiao Ren, Ping-you Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate and compare content defects of real-time and summary nursing records. Methods 390 pieces of real-time nursing records and 390 pieces of summary nursing records were randomly reviewed. The defects of contents in timeliness, accuray, authenticity, continuity,and repetition were compared between the two groups. Results The group with real-time nursing records had a lower defect rate than the group with summary nursing records (P<0.01). Real-time records had fewer defects in timeliness, accuracy, authenticity, continuity, and repetition than summary records (P< 0.05). Conclusions The way of real-time writing nursing records can reduce the occurrence of content defects and is superior to that of summary writing in improving the quality of nursing record. Key words: Summary nursing records;  Real-time nursing records;  Contents of the nursing records;  Defects

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate and compare content defects of real-time and summary nursing records. Methods 390 pieces of real-time nursing records and 390 pieces of summary nursing records were randomly reviewed. The defects of contents in timeliness, accuray, authenticity, continuity,and repetition were compared between the two groups. Results The group with real-time nursing records had a lower defect rate than the group with summary nursing records (P<0.01). Real-time records had fewer defects in timeliness, accuracy, authenticity, continuity, and repetition than summary records (P< 0.05). Conclusions The way of real-time writing nursing records can reduce the occurrence of content defects and is superior to that of summary writing in improving the quality of nursing record. Key words: Summary nursing records;  Real-time nursing records;  Contents of the nursing records;  Defects

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate and compare content defects of real-time and summary nursing records. Methods 390 pieces of real-time nursing records and 390 pieces of summary nursing records were randomly reviewed. The defects of contents in timeliness, accuray, authenticity, continuity,and repetition were compared between the two groups. Results The group with real-time nursing records had a lower defect rate than the group with summary nursing records (P<0.01). Real-time records had fewer defects in timeliness, accuracy, authenticity, continuity, and repetition than summary records (P< 0.05). Conclusions The way of real-time writing nursing records can reduce the occurrence of content defects and is superior to that of summary writing in improving the quality of nursing record. Key words: Summary nursing records;  Real-time nursing records;  Contents of the nursing records;  Defects

Key concepts: Nursing records, Nursing, Repetition (rhetorical device), Medical record, Quality (philosophy), Medicine, Hospital records, MEDLINE

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of content defects between real-time and summary nursing records — Research Paper | ScholarLens