2009•Guoji zhongliuxue zazhiRequires access

The clinical research of late course hyperfractionated radiotherapy plus different chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

Guangming Zhang, Wen-kui Mao, H. J. Long

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the treatment results and side-reactions of esophageal carcinoma with late course hyperfractionated radiotherapy ( LCHR) plus different chemotherapy. Methods A prospective research was carried out on 287 advanced stage esophageal carcinoma patients whom were randomized into there groups;LCHR + cisplatin +5-fluorouracil +leucovorin group( A group), LCHR +5-fluorouracil polyphase lipo- some group (B group) and LCHR group(C group). 115 patients were in A group and 107 patients in B group and 65 patients in C group. Radiotherapy method; there groups were treated by conventional fractionated radio- therapy during the first two-thirds of the whole course with 40 Cy,then followed by isocenter hyperfractionated radiotherapy to keep away of spinal marrow, 1. 3-1. 5Gy per time,2 times a day and 5 days a week. The total dose was 60-66 Gy in A, B group and 60-70 Gy in C group. The preventive dose was 50 Gy. Results There was no statistically difference among the there groups on the short-term curative effect The 1- ,2- ,3-year local control rate was 80% ,50.4% ,42.6% and 72.9% ,51.4% ,41. 1% and 63.1% ,38.5% ,30.8% Key words: Esophageal neoplasms;  Radiotherapy;  Drug therapy;  Dosage fractionation;  Prognosis

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the treatment results and side-reactions of esophageal carcinoma with late course hyperfractionated radiotherapy ( LCHR) plus different chemotherapy. Methods A prospective research was carried out on 287 advanced stage esophageal carcinoma patients whom were randomized into there groups;LCHR + cisplatin +5-fluorouracil +leucovorin group( A group), LCHR +5-fluorouracil polyphase lipo- some group (B group) and LCHR group(C group). 115 patients were in A group and 107 patients in B group and 65 patients in C group. Radiotherapy method; there groups were treated by conventional fractionated radio- therapy during the first two-thirds of the whole course with 40 Cy,then followed by isocenter hyperfractionated radiotherapy to keep away of spinal marrow, 1. 3-1. 5Gy per time,2 times a day and 5 days a week. The total dose was 60-66 Gy in A, B group and 60-70 Gy in C group. The preventive dose was 50 Gy. Results There was no statistically difference among the there groups on the short-term curative effect The 1- ,2- ,3-year local control rate was 80% ,50.4% ,42.6% and 72.9% ,51.4% ,41. 1% and 63.1% ,38.5% ,30.8% Key words: Esophageal neoplasms;  Radiotherapy;  Drug therapy;  Dosage fractionation;  Prognosis

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the treatment results and side-reactions of esophageal carcinoma with late course hyperfractionated radiotherapy ( LCHR) plus different chemotherapy. Methods A prospective research was carried out on 287 advanced stage esophageal carcinoma patients whom were randomized into there groups;LCHR + cisplatin +5-fluorouracil +leucovorin group( A group), LCHR +5-fluorouracil polyphase lipo- some group (B group) and LCHR group(C group). 115 patients were in A group and 107 patients in B group and 65 patients in C group. Radiotherapy method; there groups were treated by conventional fractionated radio- therapy during the first two-thirds of the whole course with 40 Cy,then followed by isocenter hyperfractionated radiotherapy to keep away of spinal marrow, 1. 3-1. 5Gy per time,2 times a day and 5 days a week. The total dose was 60-66 Gy in A, B group and 60-70 Gy in C group. The preventive dose was 50 Gy. Results There was no statistically difference among the there groups on the short-term curative effect The 1- ,2- ,3-year local control rate was 80% ,50.4% ,42.6% and 72.9% ,51.4% ,41. 1% and 63.1% ,38.5% ,30.8% Key words: Esophageal neoplasms;  Radiotherapy;  Drug therapy;  Dosage fractionation;  Prognosis

Key concepts: Medicine, Radiation therapy, Chemotherapy, Carcinoma, Cisplatin, Fluorouracil, Bone marrow suppression, Group B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinical research of late course hyperfractionated radiotherapy plus different chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens