2010•Chin Arch Gen Surg(Electronic Edition)Requires access

Comparison of propofol and remifentanil for conscious sedation during breast biopsy surgery

Hui Zhang, Hai Jiang, Ying Xiao, Lu Yang, Kang-Qing Xu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the sedation effects of propol and remifentanil during breast biopsy under monitored anesthesia care(MAC). Methods Forty patients undergoing single-lateral breast biopsy were randomly assigned to propofol group and remifentanil group, with 20 patients in each group. In propofol group, and infusion was initiated 2 mg·kg-1·h-1, then decreased to 1 mg·kg-1·h-1 5 minutes later before operation, and maintained 2 mg·kg-1·h-1 during operation. In remifentanil group, and infusion was initiated 0.1 μg·kg-1·min, then decreased to 0.05μg·kg-1·min-1 until end of procedure. The pain was evaluated with a ten-point visual analogue scale(VAS) and the sedation was evaluated with OAA/S scale during local anesthetic infiltration and deep tissue dissection. The awake time after operation(OAA/S score was 5), the pain scores 30min after operation and any postoperative complications were recorded. Results The pain scores and sedation scores were similar between two groups. Seven patients in remifentanil group and one patient in propofol group experienced a decline in respiratory rate lower than 8 bpm(P<0.05), but correction was rapid following verbal instruction. Conclusion Both propofol and remifentanil provide good sedation druing breast biopsy under monitored anesthesia care, but remifentanil decrease respiratory rate significantly. Key words: Propofol; Remifentanil; Conscious sedation

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the sedation effects of propol and remifentanil during breast biopsy under monitored anesthesia care(MAC). Methods Forty patients undergoing single-lateral breast biopsy were randomly assigned to propofol group and remifentanil group, with 20 patients in each group. In propofol group, and infusion was initiated 2 mg·kg-1·h-1, then decreased to 1 mg·kg-1·h-1 5 minutes later before operation, and maintained 2 mg·kg-1·h-1 during operation. In remifentanil group, and infusion was initiated 0.1 μg·kg-1·min, then decreased to 0.05μg·kg-1·min-1 until end of procedure. The pain was evaluated with a ten-point visual analogue scale(VAS) and the sedation was evaluated with OAA/S scale during local anesthetic infiltration and deep tissue dissection. The awake time after operation(OAA/S score was 5), the pain scores 30min after operation and any postoperative complications were recorded. Results The pain scores and sedation scores were similar between two groups. Seven patients in remifentanil group and one patient in propofol group experienced a decline in respiratory rate lower than 8 bpm(P<0.05), but correction was rapid following verbal instruction. Conclusion Both propofol and remifentanil provide good sedation druing breast biopsy under monitored anesthesia care, but remifentanil decrease respiratory rate significantly. Key words: Propofol; Remifentanil; Conscious sedation

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the sedation effects of propol and remifentanil during breast biopsy under monitored anesthesia care(MAC). Methods Forty patients undergoing single-lateral breast biopsy were randomly assigned to propofol group and remifentanil group, with 20 patients in each group. In propofol group, and infusion was initiated 2 mg·kg-1·h-1, then decreased to 1 mg·kg-1·h-1 5 minutes later before operation, and maintained 2 mg·kg-1·h-1 during operation. In remifentanil group, and infusion was initiated 0.1 μg·kg-1·min, then decreased to 0.05μg·kg-1·min-1 until end of procedure. The pain was evaluated with a ten-point visual analogue scale(VAS) and the sedation was evaluated with OAA/S scale during local anesthetic infiltration and deep tissue dissection. The awake time after operation(OAA/S score was 5), the pain scores 30min after operation and any postoperative complications were recorded. Results The pain scores and sedation scores were similar between two groups. Seven patients in remifentanil group and one patient in propofol group experienced a decline in respiratory rate lower than 8 bpm(P<0.05), but correction was rapid following verbal instruction. Conclusion Both propofol and remifentanil provide good sedation druing breast biopsy under monitored anesthesia care, but remifentanil decrease respiratory rate significantly. Key words: Propofol; Remifentanil; Conscious sedation

Key concepts: Remifentanil, Propofol, Sedation, Medicine, Anesthesia, Breast biopsy, Anesthetic, Visual analogue scale

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of propofol and remifentanil for conscious sedation during breast biopsy surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens