2018Chin J Obes Metab Dis(Electronic Edition)Requires access

Application of propofol during painless gastroscopy in morbidly obese patients: a comparison of three different anesthetisa methods

Wang Xiao-de, Yangyang Pan, Nannan Qiao, Guiping Xu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective By comparing the sedative effects of three anesthetisa methods of propofol on painless gastroscopy in morbidly obese patients to explore the optimal administration method of propofol. Methods 90 patients with painless gastroscopy in the People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, aged 18 to 50 years, with BMI over 35 kg/m2, and ASA class I to II. They were randomly divided into three groups according the digital table method, with 30 patients in each group. At first, all the three groups of patients were given 0.1 μg/kg Sufentanil; in group A, 2 mg/kg propofol was injected after 2 minutes. In the group B, 1mg/kg propofol was given during at the same time as sufentanil, and the addition of 1 mg/kg propofol after 2min. In the group C, propofol was injected to maintain the plasma concentration at Cpt 2.5 μg/mL by TCI during giving sufentanil. All three groups were inserted nasopharyngeal airway after the patient fell asleep and the reflexes of the eyelashes disappeared. The anesthesiologist lifted the patient's lower jaw and operation began after patients breathed smoothly. If there is obvious body movement during operation, additional 0.5 mg/kg propofol would be added to enhance and maintain anesthesia. The heart rate (HR) of the three groups before the induction of anesthesia (T0), after the induction of anesthesia (T1), and at the time of the blink (T2) were recorded. We observed the numbers of coughing, significant respiratory depression and stopping operations; the Ramsay sedation score, time to start operation; time of opening their eyes, recovering orientation and recovering cognition, and propofol dosage (mg/kg). Results There was a statistically significant difference in HR between T1 and T0 in group A and group C (P 0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression was significantly lower in group B than in group A and C (P<0.05). Compared with group B and C, the incidence of cough and cessation during operation was significantly higher in group A (P<0.05). Compared with group B and C, the Ramsay sedation score was significantly lower in group A (P<0.05). The time of starting operation, opening eyes, recovering orientation and cognition in group B were significantly shorter than those of group A and group C (P<0.05). Compared with group A and C, the dosage of group B was significantly reduced (P<0.05). Conclusions The best mode of anesthesia for painless gastroscopy in obese patients is drug administration in divided doses. Key words: propofol; ureteral stent removal surgery; methods of anesthetisa

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective By comparing the sedative effects of three anesthetisa methods of propofol on painless gastroscopy in morbidly obese patients to explore the optimal administration method of propofol. Methods 90 patients with painless gastroscopy in the People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, aged 18 to 50 years, with BMI over 35 kg/m2, and ASA class I to II. They were randomly divided into three groups according the digital table method, with 30 patients in each group. At first, all the three groups of patients were given 0.1 μg/kg Sufentanil; in group A, 2 mg/kg propofol was injected after 2 minutes. In the group B, 1mg/kg propofol was given during at the same time as sufentanil, and the addition of 1 mg/kg propofol after 2min. In the group C, propofol was injected to maintain the plasma concentration at Cpt 2.5 μg/mL by TCI during giving sufentanil. All three groups were inserted nasopharyngeal airway after the patient fell asleep and the reflexes of the eyelashes disappeared. The anesthesiologist lifted the patient's lower jaw and operation began after patients breathed smoothly. If there is obvious body movement during operation, additional 0.5 mg/kg propofol would be added to enhance and maintain anesthesia. The heart rate (HR) of the three groups before the induction of anesthesia (T0), after the induction of anesthesia (T1), and at the time of the blink (T2) were recorded. We observed the numbers of coughing, significant respiratory depression and stopping operations; the Ramsay sedation score, time to start operation; time of opening their eyes, recovering orientation and recovering cognition, and propofol dosage (mg/kg). Results There was a statistically significant difference in HR between T1 and T0 in group A and group C (P 0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression was significantly lower in group B than in group A and C (P<0.05). Compared with group B and C, the incidence of cough and cessation during operation was significantly higher in group A (P<0.05). Compared with group B and C, the Ramsay sedation score was significantly lower in group A (P<0.05). The time of starting operation, opening eyes, recovering orientation and cognition in group B were significantly shorter than those of group A and group C (P<0.05). Compared with group A and C, the dosage of group B was significantly reduced (P<0.05). Conclusions The best mode of anesthesia for painless gastroscopy in obese patients is drug administration in divided doses. Key words: propofol; ureteral stent removal surgery; methods of anesthetisa

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective By comparing the sedative effects of three anesthetisa methods of propofol on painless gastroscopy in morbidly obese patients to explore the optimal administration method of propofol. Methods 90 patients with painless gastroscopy in the People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, aged 18 to 50 years, with BMI over 35 kg/m2, and ASA class I to II. They were randomly divided into three groups according the digital table method, with 30 patients in each group. At first, all the three groups of patients were given 0.1 μg/kg Sufentanil; in group A, 2 mg/kg propofol was injected after 2 minutes. In the group B, 1mg/kg propofol was given during at the same time as sufentanil, and the addition of 1 mg/kg propofol after 2min. In the group C, propofol was injected to maintain the plasma concentration at Cpt 2.5 μg/mL by TCI during giving sufentanil. All three groups were inserted nasopharyngeal airway after the patient fell asleep and the reflexes of the eyelashes disappeared. The anesthesiologist lifted the patient's lower jaw and operation began after patients breathed smoothly. If there is obvious body movement during operation, additional 0.5 mg/kg propofol would be added to enhance and maintain anesthesia. The heart rate (HR) of the three groups before the induction of anesthesia (T0), after the induction of anesthesia (T1), and at the time of the blink (T2) were recorded. We observed the numbers of coughing, significant respiratory depression and stopping operations; the Ramsay sedation score, time to start operation; time of opening their eyes, recovering orientation and recovering cognition, and propofol dosage (mg/kg). Results There was a statistically significant difference in HR between T1 and T0 in group A and group C (P 0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression was significantly lower in group B than in group A and C (P<0.05). Compared with group B and C, the incidence of cough and cessation during operation was significantly higher in group A (P<0.05). Compared with group B and C, the Ramsay sedation score was significantly lower in group A (P<0.05). The time of starting operation, opening eyes, recovering orientation and cognition in group B were significantly shorter than those of group A and group C (P<0.05). Compared with group A and C, the dosage of group B was significantly reduced (P<0.05). Conclusions The best mode of anesthesia for painless gastroscopy in obese patients is drug administration in divided doses. Key words: propofol; ureteral stent removal surgery; methods of anesthetisa

Key concepts: Propofol, Sufentanil, Medicine, Anesthesia, Sedation, Surgery, Sedative

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of propofol during painless gastroscopy in morbidly obese patients: a comparison of three different anesthetisa methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens