2016•Zhonghua fangshe zhongliuxue zazhiRequires access

Cellular response to fludarabine treatment in combination with different ionizing radiation in renal carcinoma 786-O cells

Lei Song, Yong Liu, Weilin Ma, Linlin Chen, Zhong Guo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate DNA double-strand breaks and radiosensitization in renal carcinoma 786-O cells induced by fludarabine (FA) combined with different ionizing radiations. Methods The 786-O cells were exposed to FA combined with X-ray or heavy ion beam irradiation. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the percentage of γH2AX-positive cells and cell cycle. The neutral comet assay was used to detect DNA double-strand breaks. The colony-forming assay was used to evaluate the effects of different treatments on cell survival. Comparison between groups was made by one-way analysis of variance or Dunnet’s t test. Results Compared with FA alone or irradiation alone, FA combined with different ionizing radiations increased DNA double-strand breaks as shown by significantly increased levels of γH2AX (P=0.007, 0.001); FA combined with heavy ion beam irradiation lead to a cell cycle block at the radiosensitive G2/M phase and significantly increased the expression of γH2AX in the G2/M phase (P=0.000, 0.000); the neutral comet assay revealed that FA combined with irradiation significantly increased DNA sublethal damage (P=0.020, 0.060); FA significantly reduced the colony-forming rate after irradiation (P=0.000, 0.030; 0.001, 0.040). Conclusions FA enhances the effects induced by X-ray and heavy ion beam irradiation with different properties. Particularly, FA substantially enhances the cell death induced by heavy ion beam irradiation. Key words: Deoxyribonucleic acid damage; Fludarabine; Heavy ion beam; X-ray; 786-O cell line

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate DNA double-strand breaks and radiosensitization in renal carcinoma 786-O cells induced by fludarabine (FA) combined with different ionizing radiations. Methods The 786-O cells were exposed to FA combined with X-ray or heavy ion beam irradiation. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the percentage of γH2AX-positive cells and cell cycle. The neutral comet assay was used to detect DNA double-strand breaks. The colony-forming assay was used to evaluate the effects of different treatments on cell survival. Comparison between groups was made by one-way analysis of variance or Dunnet’s t test. Results Compared with FA alone or irradiation alone, FA combined with different ionizing radiations increased DNA double-strand breaks as shown by significantly increased levels of γH2AX (P=0.007, 0.001); FA combined with heavy ion beam irradiation lead to a cell cycle block at the radiosensitive G2/M phase and significantly increased the expression of γH2AX in the G2/M phase (P=0.000, 0.000); the neutral comet assay revealed that FA combined with irradiation significantly increased DNA sublethal damage (P=0.020, 0.060); FA significantly reduced the colony-forming rate after irradiation (P=0.000, 0.030; 0.001, 0.040). Conclusions FA enhances the effects induced by X-ray and heavy ion beam irradiation with different properties. Particularly, FA substantially enhances the cell death induced by heavy ion beam irradiation. Key words: Deoxyribonucleic acid damage; Fludarabine; Heavy ion beam; X-ray; 786-O cell line

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate DNA double-strand breaks and radiosensitization in renal carcinoma 786-O cells induced by fludarabine (FA) combined with different ionizing radiations. Methods The 786-O cells were exposed to FA combined with X-ray or heavy ion beam irradiation. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the percentage of γH2AX-positive cells and cell cycle. The neutral comet assay was used to detect DNA double-strand breaks. The colony-forming assay was used to evaluate the effects of different treatments on cell survival. Comparison between groups was made by one-way analysis of variance or Dunnet’s t test. Results Compared with FA alone or irradiation alone, FA combined with different ionizing radiations increased DNA double-strand breaks as shown by significantly increased levels of γH2AX (P=0.007, 0.001); FA combined with heavy ion beam irradiation lead to a cell cycle block at the radiosensitive G2/M phase and significantly increased the expression of γH2AX in the G2/M phase (P=0.000, 0.000); the neutral comet assay revealed that FA combined with irradiation significantly increased DNA sublethal damage (P=0.020, 0.060); FA significantly reduced the colony-forming rate after irradiation (P=0.000, 0.030; 0.001, 0.040). Conclusions FA enhances the effects induced by X-ray and heavy ion beam irradiation with different properties. Particularly, FA substantially enhances the cell death induced by heavy ion beam irradiation. Key words: Deoxyribonucleic acid damage; Fludarabine; Heavy ion beam; X-ray; 786-O cell line

Key concepts: Comet assay, Ionizing radiation, Irradiation, DNA damage, Cell cycle, Chemistry, Flow cytometry, Molecular biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cellular response to fludarabine treatment in combination with different ionizing radiation in renal carcinoma 786-O cells — Research Paper | ScholarLens