2012Chinese Journal of Practical OphthalmologyRequires access

Comparison of the effect of SBK and Epi-LASIK on correcting high myopia

Jing Chen, Su-Ning Han, Haiping Zhu, Hongyan Deng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of sub-Bowman keratomileusis (SBK) and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK) for correcting high myopia. Methods Ninety-one patients (182 eyes) underwent SBK or Epi-LASIK surgery for correcting high myopia,including 53 patients (106 eyes) for SBK and 38 patients (76 eyes) for Epi-LASIK.Visual acuity,remained diopter and corneal haze were examined after operation.The results were analyzed statistically. Results Patients had different degree of uncomfortable feeling early time after Epi-LASIK.Both groups showed no keratectasia by corneal topography examination 6 months after operation.One week postoperatively,the proportion of visual acuity ≥0.8 for SBK (77.4%) was more than that for Epi-LASIK (46.1%) (P < 0.05).No significant differences were found in that of SBK (92.5%,95.3%,94.3%)and that of Epi-LASIK (85.5%,94.7%,90.8%) one-month,three-months and six-months postoperatively (P > 0.05).The recovery of visual acuity after SBK was quicker than Epi-LASIK.There was no statistic meaning of remained diopter between SBK [(-0.24±0.42)D,(-0.38±0.51)D,(-0.40±0.46)D]and Epi-LASIK [(-0.32±0.40)D,(-0.44±0.60)D,(-0.52±0.55)D] 1 month,3 months and 6 months postoperatively (P > 0.05).Both groups showed no refractive regression after operation.Haze was not found in SBK group.0.5 degree of haze was found in 2 eyes after Epi-LASIK 3 months postoperatively,and was disappeared 6 months postoperatively. Conclusions SBK and Epi-LASIK are both safe and effective for correcting high myopia.SBK is superior to Epi-LASIK in respect of visual acuity recovery at early time. Key words: High myopia; Sub-Bowman keratomileusis; Epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of sub-Bowman keratomileusis (SBK) and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK) for correcting high myopia. Methods Ninety-one patients (182 eyes) underwent SBK or Epi-LASIK surgery for correcting high myopia,including 53 patients (106 eyes) for SBK and 38 patients (76 eyes) for Epi-LASIK.Visual acuity,remained diopter and corneal haze were examined after operation.The results were analyzed statistically. Results Patients had different degree of uncomfortable feeling early time after Epi-LASIK.Both groups showed no keratectasia by corneal topography examination 6 months after operation.One week postoperatively,the proportion of visual acuity ≥0.8 for SBK (77.4%) was more than that for Epi-LASIK (46.1%) (P < 0.05).No significant differences were found in that of SBK (92.5%,95.3%,94.3%)and that of Epi-LASIK (85.5%,94.7%,90.8%) one-month,three-months and six-months postoperatively (P > 0.05).The recovery of visual acuity after SBK was quicker than Epi-LASIK.There was no statistic meaning of remained diopter between SBK [(-0.24±0.42)D,(-0.38±0.51)D,(-0.40±0.46)D]and Epi-LASIK [(-0.32±0.40)D,(-0.44±0.60)D,(-0.52±0.55)D] 1 month,3 months and 6 months postoperatively (P > 0.05).Both groups showed no refractive regression after operation.Haze was not found in SBK group.0.5 degree of haze was found in 2 eyes after Epi-LASIK 3 months postoperatively,and was disappeared 6 months postoperatively. Conclusions SBK and Epi-LASIK are both safe and effective for correcting high myopia.SBK is superior to Epi-LASIK in respect of visual acuity recovery at early time. Key words: High myopia; Sub-Bowman keratomileusis; Epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of sub-Bowman keratomileusis (SBK) and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK) for correcting high myopia. Methods Ninety-one patients (182 eyes) underwent SBK or Epi-LASIK surgery for correcting high myopia,including 53 patients (106 eyes) for SBK and 38 patients (76 eyes) for Epi-LASIK.Visual acuity,remained diopter and corneal haze were examined after operation.The results were analyzed statistically. Results Patients had different degree of uncomfortable feeling early time after Epi-LASIK.Both groups showed no keratectasia by corneal topography examination 6 months after operation.One week postoperatively,the proportion of visual acuity ≥0.8 for SBK (77.4%) was more than that for Epi-LASIK (46.1%) (P < 0.05).No significant differences were found in that of SBK (92.5%,95.3%,94.3%)and that of Epi-LASIK (85.5%,94.7%,90.8%) one-month,three-months and six-months postoperatively (P > 0.05).The recovery of visual acuity after SBK was quicker than Epi-LASIK.There was no statistic meaning of remained diopter between SBK [(-0.24±0.42)D,(-0.38±0.51)D,(-0.40±0.46)D]and Epi-LASIK [(-0.32±0.40)D,(-0.44±0.60)D,(-0.52±0.55)D] 1 month,3 months and 6 months postoperatively (P > 0.05).Both groups showed no refractive regression after operation.Haze was not found in SBK group.0.5 degree of haze was found in 2 eyes after Epi-LASIK 3 months postoperatively,and was disappeared 6 months postoperatively. Conclusions SBK and Epi-LASIK are both safe and effective for correcting high myopia.SBK is superior to Epi-LASIK in respect of visual acuity recovery at early time. Key words: High myopia; Sub-Bowman keratomileusis; Epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis

Key concepts: Medicine, Dioptre, Keratomileusis, LASIK, Ophthalmology, Visual acuity, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the effect of SBK and Epi-LASIK on correcting high myopia — Research Paper | ScholarLens