2016•Zhonghua xiandai huli zazhiRequires access

Effects of retention catheterization on urinary irritation symptoms in patients received general anesthesia unilateral knee arthroplasty

Jie Zhang, Xu Mei, Yingli Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the effects of retention catheterization on urinary irritation symptoms in patients received general anesthesia unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Totally 95 patients scheduled to unilateral primary TKA were randomized into two groups: the non-indwelling urinary catheter (NIC) group and the indwelling urinary catheter (IC) group. In IC group (n=48), catheter was removed within 24 hours. All patients were under the monitoring for urinary retention, urinary irritation, urinary tract infections and comfort scale. Results There were 3 cases of urinary retention and no cases of urinary irritation in the NIC group, while there was 1 case of urinary retention and 5 cases of urinary irritation. There was no significant difference between IC group and NIC group in urinary retention and urinary tract infections (P>0.05). No urinary tract infection cases in two groups. The score of sedative degree of patients in the NIC group was (3.89±0.31), and was (4.06±0.24) in the IC group (t=-2.941, P<0.05). Conclusions The risk of urinary irritation was higher in IC group than in NIC group when received total anesthesia in TKA. Indwelling urinary catheter is not routinely needed in TKA, non-indwelling urinary catheter can contribute to increasing the comfort of surgery. Key words: Total knee arthroplasty; General anesthesia; Indwelling urinary catheter; Urinary irritation; Urinary retention

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the effects of retention catheterization on urinary irritation symptoms in patients received general anesthesia unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Totally 95 patients scheduled to unilateral primary TKA were randomized into two groups: the non-indwelling urinary catheter (NIC) group and the indwelling urinary catheter (IC) group. In IC group (n=48), catheter was removed within 24 hours. All patients were under the monitoring for urinary retention, urinary irritation, urinary tract infections and comfort scale. Results There were 3 cases of urinary retention and no cases of urinary irritation in the NIC group, while there was 1 case of urinary retention and 5 cases of urinary irritation. There was no significant difference between IC group and NIC group in urinary retention and urinary tract infections (P>0.05). No urinary tract infection cases in two groups. The score of sedative degree of patients in the NIC group was (3.89±0.31), and was (4.06±0.24) in the IC group (t=-2.941, P<0.05). Conclusions The risk of urinary irritation was higher in IC group than in NIC group when received total anesthesia in TKA. Indwelling urinary catheter is not routinely needed in TKA, non-indwelling urinary catheter can contribute to increasing the comfort of surgery. Key words: Total knee arthroplasty; General anesthesia; Indwelling urinary catheter; Urinary irritation; Urinary retention

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the effects of retention catheterization on urinary irritation symptoms in patients received general anesthesia unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Totally 95 patients scheduled to unilateral primary TKA were randomized into two groups: the non-indwelling urinary catheter (NIC) group and the indwelling urinary catheter (IC) group. In IC group (n=48), catheter was removed within 24 hours. All patients were under the monitoring for urinary retention, urinary irritation, urinary tract infections and comfort scale. Results There were 3 cases of urinary retention and no cases of urinary irritation in the NIC group, while there was 1 case of urinary retention and 5 cases of urinary irritation. There was no significant difference between IC group and NIC group in urinary retention and urinary tract infections (P>0.05). No urinary tract infection cases in two groups. The score of sedative degree of patients in the NIC group was (3.89±0.31), and was (4.06±0.24) in the IC group (t=-2.941, P<0.05). Conclusions The risk of urinary irritation was higher in IC group than in NIC group when received total anesthesia in TKA. Indwelling urinary catheter is not routinely needed in TKA, non-indwelling urinary catheter can contribute to increasing the comfort of surgery. Key words: Total knee arthroplasty; General anesthesia; Indwelling urinary catheter; Urinary irritation; Urinary retention

Key concepts: Medicine, Urinary retention, Irritation, Urinary system, Anesthesia, Catheter, Total knee arthroplasty, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of retention catheterization on urinary irritation symptoms in patients received general anesthesia unilateral knee arthroplasty — Research Paper | ScholarLens