2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Clinical effect of proximal femoral nail anlirotafion fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures

Xiao-Zhen Shen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the superiority of proximal femoral nail anlirotafion(PFNA) fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Methods 106 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were included in the study.According to different intemal fixation methods, they were divided into PFNA group and 2 dynamic hip screw(DHS) group, 53 cases in each group.The intraoperative conditions, the postoperative Harris score and the incidence of complications of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The length of incision in the PFNA group was significantly shorter than that in the DHS group[(4.50±1.35)cm vs.(12.63±2.50)cm], the operative time in the PFNA group was significantly shorter than that in theDHS group[(68.50±10.22)min vs.(102.36±17.55)min], the amount of blood loss in the PFNA group was significantly less than that in the DHS group[(152.40±35.08)mL vs.(298.33±70.11)mL], there were statistically significant differences between the two groups(t=20.832, 12.138, 13.551, all P 0.05). The excellent and good rate of Harris score in the PFNA group was slightly higher than that in theDHS group(94.34% vs.86.79%), the incidence rate of postoperative complications in the PFNA group was slightly less than that in the DHS group(5.66% vs.9.43%), but there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups(χ2=1.767, 0.541, all P>0.05). Conclusion PFNA internal fixation has characteristics of less surgical trauma, less bleeding, shorter operation time and less complications.It is easy to fracture healing and functional recovery of bone and joint. Key words: Femoral fracture; Fracture fixation, internal; Fracture fixation, interamedullary

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the superiority of proximal femoral nail anlirotafion(PFNA) fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Methods 106 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were included in the study.According to different intemal fixation methods, they were divided into PFNA group and 2 dynamic hip screw(DHS) group, 53 cases in each group.The intraoperative conditions, the postoperative Harris score and the incidence of complications of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The length of incision in the PFNA group was significantly shorter than that in the DHS group[(4.50±1.35)cm vs.(12.63±2.50)cm], the operative time in the PFNA group was significantly shorter than that in theDHS group[(68.50±10.22)min vs.(102.36±17.55)min], the amount of blood loss in the PFNA group was significantly less than that in the DHS group[(152.40±35.08)mL vs.(298.33±70.11)mL], there were statistically significant differences between the two groups(t=20.832, 12.138, 13.551, all P 0.05). The excellent and good rate of Harris score in the PFNA group was slightly higher than that in theDHS group(94.34% vs.86.79%), the incidence rate of postoperative complications in the PFNA group was slightly less than that in the DHS group(5.66% vs.9.43%), but there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups(χ2=1.767, 0.541, all P>0.05). Conclusion PFNA internal fixation has characteristics of less surgical trauma, less bleeding, shorter operation time and less complications.It is easy to fracture healing and functional recovery of bone and joint. Key words: Femoral fracture; Fracture fixation, internal; Fracture fixation, interamedullary

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the superiority of proximal femoral nail anlirotafion(PFNA) fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Methods 106 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were included in the study.According to different intemal fixation methods, they were divided into PFNA group and 2 dynamic hip screw(DHS) group, 53 cases in each group.The intraoperative conditions, the postoperative Harris score and the incidence of complications of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The length of incision in the PFNA group was significantly shorter than that in the DHS group[(4.50±1.35)cm vs.(12.63±2.50)cm], the operative time in the PFNA group was significantly shorter than that in theDHS group[(68.50±10.22)min vs.(102.36±17.55)min], the amount of blood loss in the PFNA group was significantly less than that in the DHS group[(152.40±35.08)mL vs.(298.33±70.11)mL], there were statistically significant differences between the two groups(t=20.832, 12.138, 13.551, all P 0.05). The excellent and good rate of Harris score in the PFNA group was slightly higher than that in theDHS group(94.34% vs.86.79%), the incidence rate of postoperative complications in the PFNA group was slightly less than that in the DHS group(5.66% vs.9.43%), but there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups(χ2=1.767, 0.541, all P>0.05). Conclusion PFNA internal fixation has characteristics of less surgical trauma, less bleeding, shorter operation time and less complications.It is easy to fracture healing and functional recovery of bone and joint. Key words: Femoral fracture; Fracture fixation, internal; Fracture fixation, interamedullary

Key concepts: Medicine, Dynamic hip screw, Surgery, Intertrochanteric fracture, Blood loss, Fixation (population genetics), Internal fixation, Urology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical effect of proximal femoral nail anlirotafion fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures — Research Paper | ScholarLens