2011Zhonghua shenjing waike zazhiRequires access

Clinical study and differential diagnosis of intracranial hemangiopericytomas

Hua Gui, Xiaolei Wang, Yuhua Yin, Cai-fang Zhou, Haibo Zhang, Yong Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective Intracranial hemangiopericytomas (HPCs) were rare neoplasms with relatively high rates of recurrence and extracranial metastasis. The differential diagnoses from angiomatous meningiomas and solitary fibrous tumors(SFTs) are very important. This study is aimed to reveal differences in the specific immunohistochemical features of HPCs, angiomatous meningiomas and SFTs by newly developed immunohistochemical methods. Method Eleven sequential cases of HPC diagnosed in Renji hospital between 1993 and 2010 were retrospectively analyzed by immunohistochemical staining for CD34,Bcl -2 and epithelial membrane antigen ( EMA ). The cases were then re - evaluated and newly diagnosed based on the results of the immunohistochemical stainings. Results One of the eleven cases was newly diagnosed as SFTs and nine were reconfirmed as HPCs, based on the immunohistochemical studies for CD34,Bcl - 2 and EMA staining. One case was newly diagnosed as angiomatous meningioma on the basis of a strong EMA staining positivity. Three HPCs recurred and one HPC patient died of the tumor. Conclusions Given that SFTs and angiomatous meningioma have a considerably better prognosis than HPCs, it is important to carry out meticulous immunohistochemical examinations for primary diagnosis. Key words: Hemangiopericytoma; Solitary fibrous tumor; Angiomatous meningioma

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective Intracranial hemangiopericytomas (HPCs) were rare neoplasms with relatively high rates of recurrence and extracranial metastasis. The differential diagnoses from angiomatous meningiomas and solitary fibrous tumors(SFTs) are very important. This study is aimed to reveal differences in the specific immunohistochemical features of HPCs, angiomatous meningiomas and SFTs by newly developed immunohistochemical methods. Method Eleven sequential cases of HPC diagnosed in Renji hospital between 1993 and 2010 were retrospectively analyzed by immunohistochemical staining for CD34,Bcl -2 and epithelial membrane antigen ( EMA ). The cases were then re - evaluated and newly diagnosed based on the results of the immunohistochemical stainings. Results One of the eleven cases was newly diagnosed as SFTs and nine were reconfirmed as HPCs, based on the immunohistochemical studies for CD34,Bcl - 2 and EMA staining. One case was newly diagnosed as angiomatous meningioma on the basis of a strong EMA staining positivity. Three HPCs recurred and one HPC patient died of the tumor. Conclusions Given that SFTs and angiomatous meningioma have a considerably better prognosis than HPCs, it is important to carry out meticulous immunohistochemical examinations for primary diagnosis. Key words: Hemangiopericytoma; Solitary fibrous tumor; Angiomatous meningioma

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective Intracranial hemangiopericytomas (HPCs) were rare neoplasms with relatively high rates of recurrence and extracranial metastasis. The differential diagnoses from angiomatous meningiomas and solitary fibrous tumors(SFTs) are very important. This study is aimed to reveal differences in the specific immunohistochemical features of HPCs, angiomatous meningiomas and SFTs by newly developed immunohistochemical methods. Method Eleven sequential cases of HPC diagnosed in Renji hospital between 1993 and 2010 were retrospectively analyzed by immunohistochemical staining for CD34,Bcl -2 and epithelial membrane antigen ( EMA ). The cases were then re - evaluated and newly diagnosed based on the results of the immunohistochemical stainings. Results One of the eleven cases was newly diagnosed as SFTs and nine were reconfirmed as HPCs, based on the immunohistochemical studies for CD34,Bcl - 2 and EMA staining. One case was newly diagnosed as angiomatous meningioma on the basis of a strong EMA staining positivity. Three HPCs recurred and one HPC patient died of the tumor. Conclusions Given that SFTs and angiomatous meningioma have a considerably better prognosis than HPCs, it is important to carry out meticulous immunohistochemical examinations for primary diagnosis. Key words: Hemangiopericytoma; Solitary fibrous tumor; Angiomatous meningioma

Key concepts: Hemangiopericytoma, Immunohistochemistry, Solitary fibrous tumor, CD34, Meningioma, Medicine, Pathology, Differential diagnosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical study and differential diagnosis of intracranial hemangiopericytomas — Research Paper | ScholarLens