Therapeutic effect of internal oral drainage combined with open fistulectomy on anal fistula
Hongzhi Ma
Abstract
Hongzhi Ma
Abstract
Objective To study the effect of internal oral drainage and open fistulectomy on anal fistula. Methods From January 2017 to October 2017, 80 cases of anal fistula treated in our hospital were randomly divided into the study group and the control group, with 40 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with routine surgery for anal fistula, and the patients in the study group were treated with internal mouth drainage and open fistulectomy for anal fistula. Results The effective rate in the study group was obviously higher than that in the control group (P 0.05); after treatment, the incidence of complications in the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The wound bleeding and wound edge edema scores were significantly better in the study group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The average hospitalization time, wound healing time in the study group was significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions Internal line drainage combined with open fistulectomy has shorter postoperative recovery time and less pain for patients with anal fistula, which is worthy of wide application. Key words: Inner mouth drainage; Open fistulectomy; Anal fistula; Clinical application; Therapeutic effect
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To study the effect of internal oral drainage and open fistulectomy on anal fistula. Methods From January 2017 to October 2017, 80 cases of anal fistula treated in our hospital were randomly divided into the study group and the control group, with 40 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with routine surgery for anal fistula, and the patients in the study group were treated with internal mouth drainage and open fistulectomy for anal fistula. Results The effective rate in the study group was obviously higher than that in the control group (P 0.05); after treatment, the incidence of complications in the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The wound bleeding and wound edge edema scores were significantly better in the study group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The average hospitalization time, wound healing time in the study group was significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions Internal line drainage combined with open fistulectomy has shorter postoperative recovery time and less pain for patients with anal fistula, which is worthy of wide application. Key words: Inner mouth drainage; Open fistulectomy; Anal fistula; Clinical application; Therapeutic effect
Key concepts: Fistulectomy, Medicine, Anal fistula, Surgery, Fistula, Therapeutic effect, Incidence (geometry), Optics