2015•Chin J Clin Infect DisRequires access

Clinical efficacy of entecavir monotherapy and combination of entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with suboptimal response to adefovir dipivoxil

Haijun Chen, Hong Yan Qiao, Yinggang Chen, Jianming Wang, Qing Yuan, Ping Wu, Qiyue Sheng, Yuxiang Guo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of entecavir (ETV) monotherapy and combination of ETV and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with suboptimal response to ADV. Methods A total of 82 CHB patients with HBeAg-positive who demonstrated suboptimal responses to ADV monotherapy were enrolled from Jinhua Central Hospital in Zhejiang Proince during January 2010 and June 2013. Patients were randomly divided into ETV group (n=34) and ETV + ADV group (n=48). Normalization rates of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TBil), negative conversion rates of HBeAg and HBV DNA, seroconversion rate of HBeAg and adverse reactions were observed at 12-, 24-, 48-, 72- and 96-week of treatment. Chi-square test or t-test was used for data analysis. Results At 96-week of treatment, the normalization rates of ALT and TBil in ETV group were 97.06% (33/34) and 94.12% (32/34), while those in ETV+ ADV group were 97.92% (47/48) and 97.92% (47/48), respectively (χ2=0.000 and 0.093, all P>0.05). The negative conversion rates of HBeAg, HBV DNA, and the seroconversion rate of HBeAg in ETV group were 23.53% (8/34), 94.12% (32/34) and 11.76% (4/34), while those in ETV+ ADV group were 22.92% (11/48), 97.92% (47/48) and 14.58% (7/48), respectively (χ2=0.004, 0.093 and 0.093, all P>0.05). No obvious adverse reaction was observed during the treatment in both groups, but the average medical cost in ETV group (20 035.2 Yuan) was lower than that in ETV+ ADV group (30 636.96 Yuan). Conclusion Both ETV monotherapy and combined use of ETV and ADV have satisfactory clinical efficacy for HBeAg-positive CHB patients with suboptimal response to ADV, and ETV monotherapy is a better option since it is more economical. Key words: Hepatitis B, chronic; Entecavir; Adefovir dipivoxil; Antiviral agents; Treatment outcome

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of entecavir (ETV) monotherapy and combination of ETV and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with suboptimal response to ADV. Methods A total of 82 CHB patients with HBeAg-positive who demonstrated suboptimal responses to ADV monotherapy were enrolled from Jinhua Central Hospital in Zhejiang Proince during January 2010 and June 2013. Patients were randomly divided into ETV group (n=34) and ETV + ADV group (n=48). Normalization rates of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TBil), negative conversion rates of HBeAg and HBV DNA, seroconversion rate of HBeAg and adverse reactions were observed at 12-, 24-, 48-, 72- and 96-week of treatment. Chi-square test or t-test was used for data analysis. Results At 96-week of treatment, the normalization rates of ALT and TBil in ETV group were 97.06% (33/34) and 94.12% (32/34), while those in ETV+ ADV group were 97.92% (47/48) and 97.92% (47/48), respectively (χ2=0.000 and 0.093, all P>0.05). The negative conversion rates of HBeAg, HBV DNA, and the seroconversion rate of HBeAg in ETV group were 23.53% (8/34), 94.12% (32/34) and 11.76% (4/34), while those in ETV+ ADV group were 22.92% (11/48), 97.92% (47/48) and 14.58% (7/48), respectively (χ2=0.004, 0.093 and 0.093, all P>0.05). No obvious adverse reaction was observed during the treatment in both groups, but the average medical cost in ETV group (20 035.2 Yuan) was lower than that in ETV+ ADV group (30 636.96 Yuan). Conclusion Both ETV monotherapy and combined use of ETV and ADV have satisfactory clinical efficacy for HBeAg-positive CHB patients with suboptimal response to ADV, and ETV monotherapy is a better option since it is more economical. Key words: Hepatitis B, chronic; Entecavir; Adefovir dipivoxil; Antiviral agents; Treatment outcome

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of entecavir (ETV) monotherapy and combination of ETV and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with suboptimal response to ADV. Methods A total of 82 CHB patients with HBeAg-positive who demonstrated suboptimal responses to ADV monotherapy were enrolled from Jinhua Central Hospital in Zhejiang Proince during January 2010 and June 2013. Patients were randomly divided into ETV group (n=34) and ETV + ADV group (n=48). Normalization rates of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TBil), negative conversion rates of HBeAg and HBV DNA, seroconversion rate of HBeAg and adverse reactions were observed at 12-, 24-, 48-, 72- and 96-week of treatment. Chi-square test or t-test was used for data analysis. Results At 96-week of treatment, the normalization rates of ALT and TBil in ETV group were 97.06% (33/34) and 94.12% (32/34), while those in ETV+ ADV group were 97.92% (47/48) and 97.92% (47/48), respectively (χ2=0.000 and 0.093, all P>0.05). The negative conversion rates of HBeAg, HBV DNA, and the seroconversion rate of HBeAg in ETV group were 23.53% (8/34), 94.12% (32/34) and 11.76% (4/34), while those in ETV+ ADV group were 22.92% (11/48), 97.92% (47/48) and 14.58% (7/48), respectively (χ2=0.004, 0.093 and 0.093, all P>0.05). No obvious adverse reaction was observed during the treatment in both groups, but the average medical cost in ETV group (20 035.2 Yuan) was lower than that in ETV+ ADV group (30 636.96 Yuan). Conclusion Both ETV monotherapy and combined use of ETV and ADV have satisfactory clinical efficacy for HBeAg-positive CHB patients with suboptimal response to ADV, and ETV monotherapy is a better option since it is more economical. Key words: Hepatitis B, chronic; Entecavir; Adefovir dipivoxil; Antiviral agents; Treatment outcome

Key concepts: Adefovir, Entecavir, Medicine, Gastroenterology, HBeAg, Internal medicine, Seroconversion, Chronic hepatitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical efficacy of entecavir monotherapy and combination of entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with suboptimal response to adefovir dipivoxil — Research Paper | ScholarLens