2012Zhongguo jiceng yiyaoRequires access

The comparison of the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and prednisone in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome complicated with hepatitis B

Jing Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of liver damage of the methylprednisolone (methylprednisolone tablets ) and prednisone treating nephrotic syndrome compicated with hepatitis B.Methods 66 patients with nephrotic syndrome complicated with hepatitis B were randomly divided into control group and observation group,and each group had 33 cases.The control group was given prednisone in the morning,while the observation group was received methylprednisolone.The clinical efficacy and side effects of liver damage were compared between the two groups.Results After the treatment,the biochemical index significantly improved compared with the pre-treatment( all P < 0.05 ) ;The total effective rate of observation group was 93.94% higher than 84.85% of the control group( x2 =1.44,P > 0.05 ).However,there was no significant difference between the two groups( P >0.05) ;The observation group was significantly higher than the control group in negative rate of HBV-DNA (x2 =4.69,P < 0.05 ) ;The side effects of liver damage in the observation group were lower than the control group (t =5.62,5.13,P < 0.05 ).Conclusion Methylprednisolone and prednisone for treating patients with nephrotic syndrome compicated with hepatitis B had good clinical efficacy,and methylprednisolone was more effective than prednisone,especially it had less side effects of liver damage than prednisone. Key words: Nephrotic syndrome;  Hepatitis B ;  Liver damage;  Methylprednisolone;  Prednisone

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of liver damage of the methylprednisolone (methylprednisolone tablets ) and prednisone treating nephrotic syndrome compicated with hepatitis B.Methods 66 patients with nephrotic syndrome complicated with hepatitis B were randomly divided into control group and observation group,and each group had 33 cases.The control group was given prednisone in the morning,while the observation group was received methylprednisolone.The clinical efficacy and side effects of liver damage were compared between the two groups.Results After the treatment,the biochemical index significantly improved compared with the pre-treatment( all P < 0.05 ) ;The total effective rate of observation group was 93.94% higher than 84.85% of the control group( x2 =1.44,P > 0.05 ).However,there was no significant difference between the two groups( P >0.05) ;The observation group was significantly higher than the control group in negative rate of HBV-DNA (x2 =4.69,P < 0.05 ) ;The side effects of liver damage in the observation group were lower than the control group (t =5.62,5.13,P < 0.05 ).Conclusion Methylprednisolone and prednisone for treating patients with nephrotic syndrome compicated with hepatitis B had good clinical efficacy,and methylprednisolone was more effective than prednisone,especially it had less side effects of liver damage than prednisone. Key words: Nephrotic syndrome;  Hepatitis B ;  Liver damage;  Methylprednisolone;  Prednisone

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of liver damage of the methylprednisolone (methylprednisolone tablets ) and prednisone treating nephrotic syndrome compicated with hepatitis B.Methods 66 patients with nephrotic syndrome complicated with hepatitis B were randomly divided into control group and observation group,and each group had 33 cases.The control group was given prednisone in the morning,while the observation group was received methylprednisolone.The clinical efficacy and side effects of liver damage were compared between the two groups.Results After the treatment,the biochemical index significantly improved compared with the pre-treatment( all P < 0.05 ) ;The total effective rate of observation group was 93.94% higher than 84.85% of the control group( x2 =1.44,P > 0.05 ).However,there was no significant difference between the two groups( P >0.05) ;The observation group was significantly higher than the control group in negative rate of HBV-DNA (x2 =4.69,P < 0.05 ) ;The side effects of liver damage in the observation group were lower than the control group (t =5.62,5.13,P < 0.05 ).Conclusion Methylprednisolone and prednisone for treating patients with nephrotic syndrome compicated with hepatitis B had good clinical efficacy,and methylprednisolone was more effective than prednisone,especially it had less side effects of liver damage than prednisone. Key words: Nephrotic syndrome;  Hepatitis B ;  Liver damage;  Methylprednisolone;  Prednisone

Key concepts: Prednisone, Medicine, Methylprednisolone, Gastroenterology, Nephrotic syndrome, Internal medicine, Hepatitis, Corticosteroid

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The comparison of the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and prednisone in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome complicated with hepatitis B — Research Paper | ScholarLens