2019•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Implications of Updating the Input-output Database of a Computable General Equilibrium Model on Emissions Mitigation Policy Analyses

Wei-Hong Hong, Hui-Chih Chai, Y.-H. Henry Chen, John M. Reilly, Sergey Paltsev

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In this study, we provide a critical evaluation about how updating the input-output data of an energy economic computable generation equilibrium (CGE) model can affect policy results, an assessment that is rarely done in existing literature if any. Specifically, we will explore how datasets with different fossil energy cost shares affect results of policy simulations that aim at reducing CO2 emissions. We prove analytically that a sudden fossil fuel price surge that provides little time for adjustment through input substitution can lead to a higher CO2 mitigation cost, and the finding is demonstrated empirically in a full scale CGE model for a base year with lower fossil fuel prices contrasted with results from a base year when fossil fuel prices had spiked. We then propose an adjustment to resolve the issues of using input-output data that embed sudden fossil fuel price hikes.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, we provide a critical evaluation about how updating the input-output data of an energy economic computable generation equilibrium (CGE) model can affect policy results, an assessment that is rarely done in existing literature if any. Specifically, we will explore how datasets with different fossil energy cost shares affect results of policy simulations that aim at reducing CO2 emissions. We prove analytically that a sudden fossil fuel price surge that provides little time for adjustment through input substitution can lead to a higher CO2 mitigation cost, and the finding is demonstrated empirically in a full scale CGE model for a base year with lower fossil fuel prices contrasted with results from a base year when fossil fuel prices had spiked. We then propose an adjustment to resolve the issues of using input-output data that embed sudden fossil fuel price hikes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, we provide a critical evaluation about how updating the input-output data of an energy economic computable generation equilibrium (CGE) model can affect policy results, an assessment that is rarely done in existing literature if any. Specifically, we will explore how datasets with different fossil energy cost shares affect results of policy simulations that aim at reducing CO2 emissions. We prove analytically that a sudden fossil fuel price surge that provides little time for adjustment through input substitution can lead to a higher CO2 mitigation cost, and the finding is demonstrated empirically in a full scale CGE model for a base year with lower fossil fuel prices contrasted with results from a base year when fossil fuel prices had spiked. We then propose an adjustment to resolve the issues of using input-output data that embed sudden fossil fuel price hikes.

Key concepts: Computable general equilibrium, Fossil fuel, Economics, Econometrics, General equilibrium theory, Natural resource economics, Macroeconomics, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Implications of Updating the Input-output Database of a Computable General Equilibrium Model on Emissions Mitigation Policy Analyses — Research Paper | ScholarLens