2018Yanwaishang zhiye yanbing zazhiRequires access

Vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane annular peeling and transplantation for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole

Hui-Ru Lin, Jing Xiao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of internal limiting membrane (ILM) annular peeling and transplantation in the treatment of giant idiopathic macular hole. Methods Data of 52 eyes of 52 cases with giant idiopathic macular hole(d>500 μm) from Jul.2015 to Dec.2016 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. They were divided randomly into 2 groups: group A, 25 cases, underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling, and group B, 27 cases, received vitrectomy combined internal limiting membrane peeling and transplantation. After surgery the follow-up time was more than 3 months. Results The visual acuity at 3 months after surgery was 0.86±0.27 in group A and 0.62±0.16 in group B. The difference was statistically significant(t=4.000, P=0.030). Macular hole closure rate was 84% in group A and 100% in group B. The difference was statistically significant(χ2=4.680, P=0.047). Defect of ellipsoid zone was (842.08±146.64)μm in group A and (513.89±85.59)μm in group B. The difference was statistically significant(t=6.920, P=0.010). Conclusion Vitrectomy combined with annular ILM peeling and transplantation for the treatment of giant idiopathic macular hole can increase the rate of macular hole closure and improve the visual function. Key words: Retinal perforations; Vitrectomy; Peeling, limiting membrane, internal, annular; Transplantation, limiting membrane, internal

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the efficacy of internal limiting membrane (ILM) annular peeling and transplantation in the treatment of giant idiopathic macular hole. Methods Data of 52 eyes of 52 cases with giant idiopathic macular hole(d>500 μm) from Jul.2015 to Dec.2016 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. They were divided randomly into 2 groups: group A, 25 cases, underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling, and group B, 27 cases, received vitrectomy combined internal limiting membrane peeling and transplantation. After surgery the follow-up time was more than 3 months. Results The visual acuity at 3 months after surgery was 0.86±0.27 in group A and 0.62±0.16 in group B. The difference was statistically significant(t=4.000, P=0.030). Macular hole closure rate was 84% in group A and 100% in group B. The difference was statistically significant(χ2=4.680, P=0.047). Defect of ellipsoid zone was (842.08±146.64)μm in group A and (513.89±85.59)μm in group B. The difference was statistically significant(t=6.920, P=0.010). Conclusion Vitrectomy combined with annular ILM peeling and transplantation for the treatment of giant idiopathic macular hole can increase the rate of macular hole closure and improve the visual function. Key words: Retinal perforations; Vitrectomy; Peeling, limiting membrane, internal, annular; Transplantation, limiting membrane, internal

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of internal limiting membrane (ILM) annular peeling and transplantation in the treatment of giant idiopathic macular hole. Methods Data of 52 eyes of 52 cases with giant idiopathic macular hole(d>500 μm) from Jul.2015 to Dec.2016 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. They were divided randomly into 2 groups: group A, 25 cases, underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling, and group B, 27 cases, received vitrectomy combined internal limiting membrane peeling and transplantation. After surgery the follow-up time was more than 3 months. Results The visual acuity at 3 months after surgery was 0.86±0.27 in group A and 0.62±0.16 in group B. The difference was statistically significant(t=4.000, P=0.030). Macular hole closure rate was 84% in group A and 100% in group B. The difference was statistically significant(χ2=4.680, P=0.047). Defect of ellipsoid zone was (842.08±146.64)μm in group A and (513.89±85.59)μm in group B. The difference was statistically significant(t=6.920, P=0.010). Conclusion Vitrectomy combined with annular ILM peeling and transplantation for the treatment of giant idiopathic macular hole can increase the rate of macular hole closure and improve the visual function. Key words: Retinal perforations; Vitrectomy; Peeling, limiting membrane, internal, annular; Transplantation, limiting membrane, internal

Key concepts: Vitrectomy, Macular hole, Pars plana, Internal limiting membrane, Medicine, Visual acuity, Ophthalmology, Transplantation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane annular peeling and transplantation for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole — Research Paper | ScholarLens