2019•国际医药卫生导报Requires access

Application of nasal irrigation and therapeutic game in treatment for upper respiratory tract infection in children

Dongmei Feng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the application value of nasal irrigation and therapeutic game in the treatment for upper respiratory tract infection in children. Methods Ninety-six children with upper respiratory tract infection hospitalized during 2017 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 48 cases for each group. Both groups took nasal irrigation and conventional treatment; and the observation group played targeted therapeutic game before nasal irrigation. The therapeutic effect, treatment compliance, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The overall therapeutic effects of the two groups were not much different from the data reported in domestic literatures. However, the nasal irrigation treatment compliance, the incidence of adverse reactions, and family satisfaction were better in the observation group than in the control group (56.3% vs. 18.8%, 20.8% vs. 43.7%, and 66.7% vs. 22.9%), with statistical differences (all P<0.05). Conclusions Treatment assisted by nasal irrigation for upper respiratory tract infection in children is effective. And the combination with therapeutic game can significantly improve treatment compliance and effectively reduce adverse reactions. Key words: Nasal irrigation; Therapeutic game; Children; Upper respiratory tract infection

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the application value of nasal irrigation and therapeutic game in the treatment for upper respiratory tract infection in children. Methods Ninety-six children with upper respiratory tract infection hospitalized during 2017 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 48 cases for each group. Both groups took nasal irrigation and conventional treatment; and the observation group played targeted therapeutic game before nasal irrigation. The therapeutic effect, treatment compliance, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The overall therapeutic effects of the two groups were not much different from the data reported in domestic literatures. However, the nasal irrigation treatment compliance, the incidence of adverse reactions, and family satisfaction were better in the observation group than in the control group (56.3% vs. 18.8%, 20.8% vs. 43.7%, and 66.7% vs. 22.9%), with statistical differences (all P<0.05). Conclusions Treatment assisted by nasal irrigation for upper respiratory tract infection in children is effective. And the combination with therapeutic game can significantly improve treatment compliance and effectively reduce adverse reactions. Key words: Nasal irrigation; Therapeutic game; Children; Upper respiratory tract infection

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the application value of nasal irrigation and therapeutic game in the treatment for upper respiratory tract infection in children. Methods Ninety-six children with upper respiratory tract infection hospitalized during 2017 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 48 cases for each group. Both groups took nasal irrigation and conventional treatment; and the observation group played targeted therapeutic game before nasal irrigation. The therapeutic effect, treatment compliance, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The overall therapeutic effects of the two groups were not much different from the data reported in domestic literatures. However, the nasal irrigation treatment compliance, the incidence of adverse reactions, and family satisfaction were better in the observation group than in the control group (56.3% vs. 18.8%, 20.8% vs. 43.7%, and 66.7% vs. 22.9%), with statistical differences (all P<0.05). Conclusions Treatment assisted by nasal irrigation for upper respiratory tract infection in children is effective. And the combination with therapeutic game can significantly improve treatment compliance and effectively reduce adverse reactions. Key words: Nasal irrigation; Therapeutic game; Children; Upper respiratory tract infection

Key concepts: Medicine, Adverse effect, Therapeutic effect, Respiratory tract, Respiratory tract infections, Upper respiratory tract infection, Incidence (geometry), Irrigation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of nasal irrigation and therapeutic game in treatment for upper respiratory tract infection in children — Research Paper | ScholarLens