2019•Yanwaishang zhiye yanbing zazhiRequires access

Comparison of efficacy between 27G and 25G vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Yan Gao, Lili Yuan, Dongchang Zhang, Dongping Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy between 27G and 25G vitrectomy for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods The data of 185 eyes of 185 cases of PDR who received vitrectomy in this hospital from Jan. 2017 to Dec. 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. All cases were divided into two groups. There were 64 eyes in the 27G vitrectomy group and 121 eyes in the 25G vitrectomy group. Results There was no significant difference in the preoperative baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The difference of postoperative score of symptoms, operation time, intraocular pressure, reoperation rate because of retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage were all not statistically significant between the two groups(P=0.070, 0.367, 0.503, 0.667). Conclusion 27G and 25G are equally safe and effective in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Key words: Retinopathy, diabetic, proliferative; Vitrectomy, 25G, 27G; Visual acuity

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the efficacy between 27G and 25G vitrectomy for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods The data of 185 eyes of 185 cases of PDR who received vitrectomy in this hospital from Jan. 2017 to Dec. 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. All cases were divided into two groups. There were 64 eyes in the 27G vitrectomy group and 121 eyes in the 25G vitrectomy group. Results There was no significant difference in the preoperative baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The difference of postoperative score of symptoms, operation time, intraocular pressure, reoperation rate because of retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage were all not statistically significant between the two groups(P=0.070, 0.367, 0.503, 0.667). Conclusion 27G and 25G are equally safe and effective in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Key words: Retinopathy, diabetic, proliferative; Vitrectomy, 25G, 27G; Visual acuity

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy between 27G and 25G vitrectomy for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods The data of 185 eyes of 185 cases of PDR who received vitrectomy in this hospital from Jan. 2017 to Dec. 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. All cases were divided into two groups. There were 64 eyes in the 27G vitrectomy group and 121 eyes in the 25G vitrectomy group. Results There was no significant difference in the preoperative baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The difference of postoperative score of symptoms, operation time, intraocular pressure, reoperation rate because of retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage were all not statistically significant between the two groups(P=0.070, 0.367, 0.503, 0.667). Conclusion 27G and 25G are equally safe and effective in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Key words: Retinopathy, diabetic, proliferative; Vitrectomy, 25G, 27G; Visual acuity

Key concepts: Vitrectomy, Medicine, Diabetic retinopathy, Ophthalmology, Vitreous hemorrhage, Significant difference, Visual acuity, Retinal detachment

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of efficacy between 27G and 25G vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy — Research Paper | ScholarLens