2018Chinese Journal of NeuromedicineRequires access

Diagnostic value of transcranial doppler ultrasonography for middle cerebral artery stenosis: a Meta-analysis

Chenglong Li, Lixin Ma, Meng Li, Xinyu Han

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of transcranial doppler ultrasonography (TCD) for middle cerebral artery stenosis. Methods A comprehensive electronic search was performed in PubMed, EMBase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Database and VIP Database to retrieve relevant studies on TCD in diagnosis of middle cerebral artery stenosis from initiation of the databases to January 2017. The general information and diagnostic parameters were documented from the retrieved studies. The quality of the prepared studies was evaluated by QUADAS-2 and the risk assessment maps brought by RevMan 5.3 statistical software. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and the heterogeneity of the included studies were analyzed using the Stata 13.0 software. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The publication bias was assessed with funnel plotting. Results A total of 11 studies were included for this Meta analysis, involving 2 550 patients. Heterogeneity test showed that the heterogeneity was established between studies in sensitivity, specificity, NLR and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), resulting from disparity in study design and TCD test criteria (P<0.05). Meta analysis revealed a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84~0.91), a specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91~0.95), a PLR of 12.93 (95% CI: 9.90~16.90), a NLR of 0.13 (95% CI: 0.09~0.17), a diagnostic score (SCORE) of 4.63 (95% CI: 4.32~4.94), a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of102.64 (95% CI: 75.44~139.65), and an AUC of SROC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94~0.98). The sensitivity analysis after removing studies with sample capacity <100 showed that the confidence interval of the diagnostic parameters mostly overlapped with that of the original data. Conclusion As TCD shows good accuracy in diagnosing middle cerebral artery stenosis, it can be used in diagnostic screening of the disease. Key words: Transcranial doppler ultrasonography (TCD); Middle cerebral artery stenosis; Diagnosis; Meta-analysis

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of transcranial doppler ultrasonography (TCD) for middle cerebral artery stenosis. Methods A comprehensive electronic search was performed in PubMed, EMBase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Database and VIP Database to retrieve relevant studies on TCD in diagnosis of middle cerebral artery stenosis from initiation of the databases to January 2017. The general information and diagnostic parameters were documented from the retrieved studies. The quality of the prepared studies was evaluated by QUADAS-2 and the risk assessment maps brought by RevMan 5.3 statistical software. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and the heterogeneity of the included studies were analyzed using the Stata 13.0 software. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The publication bias was assessed with funnel plotting. Results A total of 11 studies were included for this Meta analysis, involving 2 550 patients. Heterogeneity test showed that the heterogeneity was established between studies in sensitivity, specificity, NLR and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), resulting from disparity in study design and TCD test criteria (P<0.05). Meta analysis revealed a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84~0.91), a specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91~0.95), a PLR of 12.93 (95% CI: 9.90~16.90), a NLR of 0.13 (95% CI: 0.09~0.17), a diagnostic score (SCORE) of 4.63 (95% CI: 4.32~4.94), a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of102.64 (95% CI: 75.44~139.65), and an AUC of SROC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94~0.98). The sensitivity analysis after removing studies with sample capacity <100 showed that the confidence interval of the diagnostic parameters mostly overlapped with that of the original data. Conclusion As TCD shows good accuracy in diagnosing middle cerebral artery stenosis, it can be used in diagnostic screening of the disease. Key words: Transcranial doppler ultrasonography (TCD); Middle cerebral artery stenosis; Diagnosis; Meta-analysis

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of transcranial doppler ultrasonography (TCD) for middle cerebral artery stenosis. Methods A comprehensive electronic search was performed in PubMed, EMBase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Database and VIP Database to retrieve relevant studies on TCD in diagnosis of middle cerebral artery stenosis from initiation of the databases to January 2017. The general information and diagnostic parameters were documented from the retrieved studies. The quality of the prepared studies was evaluated by QUADAS-2 and the risk assessment maps brought by RevMan 5.3 statistical software. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and the heterogeneity of the included studies were analyzed using the Stata 13.0 software. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The publication bias was assessed with funnel plotting. Results A total of 11 studies were included for this Meta analysis, involving 2 550 patients. Heterogeneity test showed that the heterogeneity was established between studies in sensitivity, specificity, NLR and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), resulting from disparity in study design and TCD test criteria (P<0.05). Meta analysis revealed a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84~0.91), a specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91~0.95), a PLR of 12.93 (95% CI: 9.90~16.90), a NLR of 0.13 (95% CI: 0.09~0.17), a diagnostic score (SCORE) of 4.63 (95% CI: 4.32~4.94), a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of102.64 (95% CI: 75.44~139.65), and an AUC of SROC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94~0.98). The sensitivity analysis after removing studies with sample capacity <100 showed that the confidence interval of the diagnostic parameters mostly overlapped with that of the original data. Conclusion As TCD shows good accuracy in diagnosing middle cerebral artery stenosis, it can be used in diagnostic screening of the disease. Key words: Transcranial doppler ultrasonography (TCD); Middle cerebral artery stenosis; Diagnosis; Meta-analysis

Key concepts: Diagnostic odds ratio, Medicine, Meta-analysis, Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing, Cochrane Library, Receiver operating characteristic, Transcranial Doppler, Odds ratio

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic value of transcranial doppler ultrasonography for middle cerebral artery stenosis: a Meta-analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens