2018Zhonghua putong waike zazhiRequires access

Enhanced recovery after surgery combined laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in elderly patients of choledocholithiasis

Lijun Li, Yumei Wang, Xingye Yang, Hongbing Zhou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in elderly patients with choledocholithiasis. Methods From Jan 2015 to Dec 2016, in the control group 40 patients received conventional perioperative management and 40 patients in the ERAS group followed the ERAS protocol. The operative details and outcomes were compared in the two groups. Results No perioperative death occurred during the study period. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operative time and intraoperative blood loss (t=1.04, 0.88, P>0.05). Patients in ERAS group showed significantl shorter time of gastrointestinal tract peristalsis, off-bed, postoperative infusion, food intake, and abdominal drainage tube removal, as well as reduced weight loss, length of hospital stay and total cost than those in the control group (P 0.05), However, the CRP and PCT, IL-6 levels in ERAS group were significantly lower than those in control group at postoperative days 1, 4, 7 (P<0.05). Furthermore, postoperative complications developed in 3 (7.5%), and 12 (30.0%) respectively (χ2=6.47, P<0.05). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery combined with ERAS is safe and cost-effective approach for elderly patients of choledocholithiasis. Key words: Choledocholithiasis; Laparoscopes; Enhanced recovery after surgery

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in elderly patients with choledocholithiasis. Methods From Jan 2015 to Dec 2016, in the control group 40 patients received conventional perioperative management and 40 patients in the ERAS group followed the ERAS protocol. The operative details and outcomes were compared in the two groups. Results No perioperative death occurred during the study period. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operative time and intraoperative blood loss (t=1.04, 0.88, P>0.05). Patients in ERAS group showed significantl shorter time of gastrointestinal tract peristalsis, off-bed, postoperative infusion, food intake, and abdominal drainage tube removal, as well as reduced weight loss, length of hospital stay and total cost than those in the control group (P 0.05), However, the CRP and PCT, IL-6 levels in ERAS group were significantly lower than those in control group at postoperative days 1, 4, 7 (P<0.05). Furthermore, postoperative complications developed in 3 (7.5%), and 12 (30.0%) respectively (χ2=6.47, P<0.05). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery combined with ERAS is safe and cost-effective approach for elderly patients of choledocholithiasis. Key words: Choledocholithiasis; Laparoscopes; Enhanced recovery after surgery

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in elderly patients with choledocholithiasis. Methods From Jan 2015 to Dec 2016, in the control group 40 patients received conventional perioperative management and 40 patients in the ERAS group followed the ERAS protocol. The operative details and outcomes were compared in the two groups. Results No perioperative death occurred during the study period. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operative time and intraoperative blood loss (t=1.04, 0.88, P>0.05). Patients in ERAS group showed significantl shorter time of gastrointestinal tract peristalsis, off-bed, postoperative infusion, food intake, and abdominal drainage tube removal, as well as reduced weight loss, length of hospital stay and total cost than those in the control group (P 0.05), However, the CRP and PCT, IL-6 levels in ERAS group were significantly lower than those in control group at postoperative days 1, 4, 7 (P<0.05). Furthermore, postoperative complications developed in 3 (7.5%), and 12 (30.0%) respectively (χ2=6.47, P<0.05). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery combined with ERAS is safe and cost-effective approach for elderly patients of choledocholithiasis. Key words: Choledocholithiasis; Laparoscopes; Enhanced recovery after surgery

Key concepts: Medicine, Perioperative, Surgery, Blood loss, Bile duct, Common bile duct, Abdominal surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Enhanced recovery after surgery combined laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in elderly patients of choledocholithiasis — Research Paper | ScholarLens