2017Zhonghua xiandai huli zazhiRequires access

Citation analysis of clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses published in 12 nursing core journals from 2015 to 2016

Xi Tan, Jin-Lian Cheng, Yujiao Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To describe the situation of citation on clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses and to reflect the academic level in this field and authors' capability to using literature. Methods The way of search combining printed journal and database was used to clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses published in 12 nursing core journals from 2015 to 2016. Statistical analysis was conducted on the numbers, languages, subject resources and types of citations. Results There were total 3 590 clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses from 2015 to 2016. The citation rate was 99.78% with 14.58 per paper for the average number of citation. The languages of citations were main in Chinese accounting for 60.75%. The subject resources of citations mainly included nursing (55.36%) with clinical medicine and other subjects increasing. The types of citations of Chinese and foreign language primarily contained journals accounting for 87.33% and 96.33% respectively. Conclusions The numbers of citations and the average number of citations per paper increase year by year. The nurses' capability to absorb information grows continually. However, diversified investment funds for scientific research should be strengthened and resources sharing should be promoted in the future. Key words: Clinical nursing; Citation analysis; Fund-sponsored theses

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To describe the situation of citation on clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses and to reflect the academic level in this field and authors' capability to using literature. Methods The way of search combining printed journal and database was used to clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses published in 12 nursing core journals from 2015 to 2016. Statistical analysis was conducted on the numbers, languages, subject resources and types of citations. Results There were total 3 590 clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses from 2015 to 2016. The citation rate was 99.78% with 14.58 per paper for the average number of citation. The languages of citations were main in Chinese accounting for 60.75%. The subject resources of citations mainly included nursing (55.36%) with clinical medicine and other subjects increasing. The types of citations of Chinese and foreign language primarily contained journals accounting for 87.33% and 96.33% respectively. Conclusions The numbers of citations and the average number of citations per paper increase year by year. The nurses' capability to absorb information grows continually. However, diversified investment funds for scientific research should be strengthened and resources sharing should be promoted in the future. Key words: Clinical nursing; Citation analysis; Fund-sponsored theses

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To describe the situation of citation on clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses and to reflect the academic level in this field and authors' capability to using literature. Methods The way of search combining printed journal and database was used to clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses published in 12 nursing core journals from 2015 to 2016. Statistical analysis was conducted on the numbers, languages, subject resources and types of citations. Results There were total 3 590 clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses from 2015 to 2016. The citation rate was 99.78% with 14.58 per paper for the average number of citation. The languages of citations were main in Chinese accounting for 60.75%. The subject resources of citations mainly included nursing (55.36%) with clinical medicine and other subjects increasing. The types of citations of Chinese and foreign language primarily contained journals accounting for 87.33% and 96.33% respectively. Conclusions The numbers of citations and the average number of citations per paper increase year by year. The nurses' capability to absorb information grows continually. However, diversified investment funds for scientific research should be strengthened and resources sharing should be promoted in the future. Key words: Clinical nursing; Citation analysis; Fund-sponsored theses

Key concepts: Citation, Subject (documents), Medicine, Citation analysis, Nursing, Psychology, Library science, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Citation analysis of clinical nursing fund-sponsored theses published in 12 nursing core journals from 2015 to 2016 — Research Paper | ScholarLens