2016Int J GenetRequires access

The role of chromosomal micro-array analysis in prenatal diagnosis of non-immune hydrops fetalis

Zhiqiang Zhang, Baojiang Chen, Shaobin Lin, Xiaodan Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the incidence of chromosome abnormality and copy number variation(CNV) in non-immune hydrops fetalis, and discuss the role of chromosomal micro-array analysis(CMA) in prenatal diagnosis of non-immune hydrops fetalis. Methods Forty-six cases who were diagnosed by ultrasound as Schridde syndrome were chosen. They were not caused by the immune factors judging through detecting the maternal and fetal Rh blood type, anti-D antibody, ABO blood type and other related antibody. We also calculated the ratio of fetuses with chromosome abnormality and CNV, and then analyzed their clinical data. Results Twnty-five (54.35%) cases with chromosome abnormality and CNV were confirmed by CMA, including 7(15.22%) cases of X monomer (45, XO), 3(6.52%) cases of Trisomy 21, 2(4.35%) cases of Trisomy 18, 1(2.17%) cases of XXX Syndrome (47, XXX) and 12(26.09%) cases with chromosomal micro deletion or micro duplication. Conclusion Chromosome abnormality is one of the important causes leading to non-immune hydrops fetalis. Among them, X monomer, Trisomy 21 and Trisomy 18 are the three main factors that cause non-immune hydrops fetalis. For the case of non immune hydrops fetalis, CMA can substitute the use of karyotype analysis, while promoting identification of the etiology and treatment in time. Key words: Non-immune; Hydrops fetalis; Karyotype analysis; Chromosomal micro-array

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze the incidence of chromosome abnormality and copy number variation(CNV) in non-immune hydrops fetalis, and discuss the role of chromosomal micro-array analysis(CMA) in prenatal diagnosis of non-immune hydrops fetalis. Methods Forty-six cases who were diagnosed by ultrasound as Schridde syndrome were chosen. They were not caused by the immune factors judging through detecting the maternal and fetal Rh blood type, anti-D antibody, ABO blood type and other related antibody. We also calculated the ratio of fetuses with chromosome abnormality and CNV, and then analyzed their clinical data. Results Twnty-five (54.35%) cases with chromosome abnormality and CNV were confirmed by CMA, including 7(15.22%) cases of X monomer (45, XO), 3(6.52%) cases of Trisomy 21, 2(4.35%) cases of Trisomy 18, 1(2.17%) cases of XXX Syndrome (47, XXX) and 12(26.09%) cases with chromosomal micro deletion or micro duplication. Conclusion Chromosome abnormality is one of the important causes leading to non-immune hydrops fetalis. Among them, X monomer, Trisomy 21 and Trisomy 18 are the three main factors that cause non-immune hydrops fetalis. For the case of non immune hydrops fetalis, CMA can substitute the use of karyotype analysis, while promoting identification of the etiology and treatment in time. Key words: Non-immune; Hydrops fetalis; Karyotype analysis; Chromosomal micro-array

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze the incidence of chromosome abnormality and copy number variation(CNV) in non-immune hydrops fetalis, and discuss the role of chromosomal micro-array analysis(CMA) in prenatal diagnosis of non-immune hydrops fetalis. Methods Forty-six cases who were diagnosed by ultrasound as Schridde syndrome were chosen. They were not caused by the immune factors judging through detecting the maternal and fetal Rh blood type, anti-D antibody, ABO blood type and other related antibody. We also calculated the ratio of fetuses with chromosome abnormality and CNV, and then analyzed their clinical data. Results Twnty-five (54.35%) cases with chromosome abnormality and CNV were confirmed by CMA, including 7(15.22%) cases of X monomer (45, XO), 3(6.52%) cases of Trisomy 21, 2(4.35%) cases of Trisomy 18, 1(2.17%) cases of XXX Syndrome (47, XXX) and 12(26.09%) cases with chromosomal micro deletion or micro duplication. Conclusion Chromosome abnormality is one of the important causes leading to non-immune hydrops fetalis. Among them, X monomer, Trisomy 21 and Trisomy 18 are the three main factors that cause non-immune hydrops fetalis. For the case of non immune hydrops fetalis, CMA can substitute the use of karyotype analysis, while promoting identification of the etiology and treatment in time. Key words: Non-immune; Hydrops fetalis; Karyotype analysis; Chromosomal micro-array

Key concepts: Hydrops fetalis, Trisomy, Medicine, Chromosome abnormality, Prenatal diagnosis, Karyotype, Fetus, Chromosome

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The role of chromosomal micro-array analysis in prenatal diagnosis of non-immune hydrops fetalis — Research Paper | ScholarLens