2019•Zhonghua xingwei yixue yu naokexue zazhiRequires access

Cognitive intervention for mild cognitive impairment

Jing Wang, Hao He, Yuehong Qiu, Yiqi Chen, Haobo Zhang, Yuejia Luo, Qing Guan

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Compared with age-matched controls, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) populations are at a higher risk of developing Alzheimer's disease(AD). There is no consensus that any pharmacological treatment can improve MCI, thus it is plausible to turn attention to cognitive interventions. This paper reviewed the prior researches on cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, and cognitive rehabilitation for MCI based on the categories defined by Clare and Woods in order to clarify the effect of these interventions on improving cognitive function in MCI individuals. The results indicate that cognitive interventions may improve multiple cognitive domains including memory performance, executive functions, processing speed, attention, and social functions in adults with MCI, while the mechanism remains unclear. It suggested that further studies should examine the mechanism of cognitive intervention by applying neuroscience technology and strengthening the control of heterogeneity of the etiologies and symptoms of MCI, and improve the clinical effect by combining cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, and cognitive rehabilitation. Key words: Mild cognitive impairment; Cognitive intervention; Cognitive stimulation; Cognitive training; Cognitive rehabilitation

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Compared with age-matched controls, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) populations are at a higher risk of developing Alzheimer's disease(AD). There is no consensus that any pharmacological treatment can improve MCI, thus it is plausible to turn attention to cognitive interventions. This paper reviewed the prior researches on cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, and cognitive rehabilitation for MCI based on the categories defined by Clare and Woods in order to clarify the effect of these interventions on improving cognitive function in MCI individuals. The results indicate that cognitive interventions may improve multiple cognitive domains including memory performance, executive functions, processing speed, attention, and social functions in adults with MCI, while the mechanism remains unclear. It suggested that further studies should examine the mechanism of cognitive intervention by applying neuroscience technology and strengthening the control of heterogeneity of the etiologies and symptoms of MCI, and improve the clinical effect by combining cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, and cognitive rehabilitation. Key words: Mild cognitive impairment; Cognitive intervention; Cognitive stimulation; Cognitive training; Cognitive rehabilitation

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Compared with age-matched controls, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) populations are at a higher risk of developing Alzheimer's disease(AD). There is no consensus that any pharmacological treatment can improve MCI, thus it is plausible to turn attention to cognitive interventions. This paper reviewed the prior researches on cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, and cognitive rehabilitation for MCI based on the categories defined by Clare and Woods in order to clarify the effect of these interventions on improving cognitive function in MCI individuals. The results indicate that cognitive interventions may improve multiple cognitive domains including memory performance, executive functions, processing speed, attention, and social functions in adults with MCI, while the mechanism remains unclear. It suggested that further studies should examine the mechanism of cognitive intervention by applying neuroscience technology and strengthening the control of heterogeneity of the etiologies and symptoms of MCI, and improve the clinical effect by combining cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, and cognitive rehabilitation. Key words: Mild cognitive impairment; Cognitive intervention; Cognitive stimulation; Cognitive training; Cognitive rehabilitation

Key concepts: Cognition, Cognitive rehabilitation therapy, Cognitive Intervention, Cognitive training, Cognitive remediation therapy, Psychology, Psychological intervention, Rehabilitation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cognitive intervention for mild cognitive impairment — Research Paper | ScholarLens